Multiple Choice
In Cohen v.California a man had been convicted for displaying a jacket with profane language in a courthouse corridor.Did the Supreme Court uphold the conviction?
A) Yes,because the message amounted to "fighting words."
B) Yes,because the language was obscene.
C) No,because evidence showed that no one was actually offended by the language.
D) No,because the state failed to demonstrate a compelling reason for the prosecution.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q4: Which of the following is true about
Q5: Promoting ill opinions of government in the
Q6: According to philosopher and educator Alexander Meiklejohn,what
Q7: The ability of government to control speech
Q8: Prior restraints can arise through<br>A)licensing schemes.<br>B)tax laws.<br>C)informal
Q10: As the term is used in the
Q11: Which of the following is NOT a
Q12: In most cases,content restrictions on protected expression
Q13: In Morse v.Frederick,the "Bong Hits 4 Jesus"
Q14: Society's greatest concern about corporate political speech