Essay
Indicate whether you agree or disagree with the following statements and explain your reasoning.
a) Mathew Punkinnen, the senior auditor at Jackson & Wartkauf LLP made the following statement to his audit team: "What constitutes sufficient appropriate audit evidence is a matter of judgment."
b) Ingram Foods Company operates as a specialty food distributor. Philippe Parenteaux, auditor, has told his staff that the bankruptcy of a customer at year-end should not be considered a type 1 event.
c) Manitoba Ice Dogs auditor Henry Pilon found an omission of a disclosure in the financial statements of the hockey team. He called this an error.
d) Janice Olympus was told by the client that a limitation in the scope of his work would require a modification to the audit report.
Correct Answer:

Verified
a) Agree. What constitutes sufficient ap...View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q6: Material disagreements with management will result in
Q7: An error is an intentional misstatement in
Q8: The final phase of an audit includes
Q9: An auditor may prepare or provide an
Q11: Type 1 subsequent events are events that<br>A)
Q12: Sufficiency relates to the quality of audit
Q13: Which of the following dates is least
Q14: Matters of governance that the auditor may
Q14: Mark Danyluk, the partner in charge of
Q15: Explain the difference between management's and the