Multiple Choice
Bubble Wrap Co. (BWC) , an Atlanta corporation, has its principal place of business in New York. John, a resident of Florida, asserted on his Web site that BWC is engaged in ongoing criminal activity, scams, and phishing. BWC sued John in the U.S. District Court for the District of New York, alleging defamation and injury to BWC's business in New York. John filed a motion to dismiss the case alleging that neither subject-matter nor in personam jurisdiction existed. The court granted the defendant's motion and dismissed the case because:
A) BWC could not meet its burden of establishing sufficient minimum contacts.
B) BWC did not have subject-matter jurisdiction.
C) BWC neither had subject-matter jurisdiction nor in personam jurisdiction.
D) publishing of those statements did not amount to defamation and thus no injury was caused to BWC's business.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q10: Bob is a merchant in New York
Q16: The doctrine of certiorari jurisdiction makes it
Q30: A method of alternative dispute resolution in
Q31: Malcolm has brought a lawsuit against Will.
Q32: The American legal system gives considerable power
Q36: For federal district court diversity jurisdiction to
Q40: The judgment winner can seek to enforce
Q56: In a case where concurrent jurisdiction exists,a
Q76: Abby gets a state court civil judgment
Q85: At a _,the judge meets informally with