Buyer Purchased Seller's Business on a Written Contract Providing That

Multiple Choice

Buyer purchased Seller's business on a written contract providing that Seller would stay on for three weeks to help Buyer learn the business. It became apparent Seller's help would be needed for another three weeks; the parties orally so agreed, providing also that Seller would get paid for this tutoring.

A) The term about the extra three weeks runs afoul of the parol evidence rule.
B) In issue here is the application of the statute of frauds' "main purpose" doctrine.
C) The term about the extra three weeks is admissible.
D) The three-week term is within the statute of frauds' "part performance" exception.
E) None of the above is correct.