Essay
Nancy was shopping for a new car and had a 1998 Honda Accord to trade in.In the negotiating process,the appraiser at the dealer took her car for a test drive to aid in the appraisal process.Nancy had found a car she liked and began negotiations in earnest.They settled on a price for the new car,with a final agreement contingent on an acceptable amount for the trade-in.When the sales manager brought a contract showing the price of the new car,with the deduction for the trade in,it noted "1999 Accord" as the car traded in.Everything else in the car's description (mileage,etc.)was correct.Nancy noticed this but said nothing and quickly signed the contract.A few minutes later when Nancy went to sign over the certificate of title on her old car,the sales manager said that the deal was off because he had based his trade-in allowance on the car being a 1999 model.Nancy said she would take the deal only as it was,and would not accept a lower trade-in allowance.After some further negotiations,the dealer agreed to grant the trade-in allowance as originally stated.Nancy signed over the title and took the new car home.The next morning,the sales manager called and said that the dealer was rescinding the contract based on the mistake.Discuss the issues and how this case would turn out.
Correct Answer:

Verified
The original mistake was a unilateral mi...View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q67: Sandy Student is having difficulties in her
Q68: A _ exists if both parties know
Q69: Intentional misrepresentation is commonly referred to as
Q70: Mark was shopping for a used car
Q71: The threat to bring a legitimate criminal
Q73: Where a party was given a document
Q74: The owner of a dance studio tells
Q75: Donald is looking at a new Porsche
Q76: If the seller of a product makes
Q77: John was the oldest of three boys.John's