Essay
Robert leased an apartment from Universal Apartments for $600 per month,signing a 1-year lease.After 2 months,Robert's employer transferred him out-of-state,so Robert cannot use the apartment anymore.However,Robert's friend Sam would like to take over the apartment.Robert would like to assign his lease to Sam,but the lease contains a clause that allows assignment only with the consent of the landlord.The landlord refuses to consent to the assignment,because he could now end Robert's lease and rent the apartment for $800 per month.Sam would be just as good a tenant as Robert.Discuss the validity of the antiassignment clause.
Correct Answer:

Verified
The antiassignment clause is valid,but t...View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q36: A transfer of some portion of a
Q37: Tenant has a lease on an apartment
Q37: Homeowner enters into an agreement with Grasscutter
Q38: Barb has contracted to build a garage
Q40: An accord and satisfaction:<br>A)Usually arises in settlement
Q42: The release of one party to a
Q43: Third parties never acquire rights under other
Q44: Conditions can be only:<br>A)Precedent.<br>B)Subsequent.<br>C)Precedent or subsequent.<br>D)Precedent,subsequent,or concurrent.<br>E)Precedent,subsequent,concurrent,or
Q48: In general,an incidental beneficiary has no enforceable
Q65: Which of the following is true?<br>A) A