Multiple Choice
Which of the following was the result in Angela & Raul Ruiz v.Fortune Insurance Co.,the case in the text in which the plaintiffs claimed that the defending insurer was liable to them for a loss to their mobile home although the agency to which plaintiffs' premium was remitted no longer had an agency relationship with the defendant; and the defendant had not received the payment nor renewed the plaintiffs' policy?
A) The defendant was held liable to the plaintiffs because they had not been notified of the agency termination and the nonrenewal.
B) The defendant was held liable to the plaintiffs because even if the defendant sent a notice of nonrenewal, the plaintiffs did not receive it.
C) The defendant was held liable to the plaintiffs because its former agent was in possession of funds meant for the defendant, and it was up to the defendant to obtain the funds from the former agent.
D) The defendant was not held liable to the plaintiffs because of proof it had mailed the notice of nonrenewal, even if the plaintiffs did not receive it or did not read it.
E) The court ruled that a jury question existed as to whether the plaintiffs understood the meaning of the notification of nonrenewal and that if the plaintiffs did not understand its meaning, then they were entitled to recover from the defendant.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q47: Which of the following is true regarding
Q48: According to the text,which of the following
Q50: Which of the following is true regarding
Q51: Which of the following was the result
Q53: If a manager has business transactions in
Q54: Which of the following is true under
Q55: Which of the following is true regarding
Q56: Which of the following is an agency
Q57: What type of principal is Bobby?<br>A) Disclosed<br>B)
Q64: Actual notice of agency termination may not