What Was the Result in the "Case Opener" in Which

Multiple Choice

What was the result in the "Case Opener" in which a purchaser of a puppy from a person who regularly sold puppies sued the seller for veterinarian bills after the puppy was found to be in poor health?

A) The court found that the puppy was not a good covered under the UCC, and the plaintiff was denied recovery.
B) The court refused any recovery to the plaintiff on the basis that the seller was not considered a merchant under the UCC and that no implied warranties were made.
C) The buyer in essence had no remedy because the court ruled that the plaintiff's only remedy, which the plaintiff was unwilling to do, was return of the puppy for a refund.
D) The court allowed the buyer to recover the contract price only, not veterinarian bills.
E) The court awarded the plaintiff the veterinary bills finding that the UCC applied and that the seller breached the warranty of merchantability.