Multiple Choice
Which of the following was the result in the case in the text Hamer v.Sidway,in which,after performance by his nephew,an uncle reneged on a promise to the nephew to pay him $5,000 if the nephew refrained from drinking liquor,using tobacco,swearing,and playing cards or billiards for money until he was 21 years of age?
A) That because refraining from the conduct at issue benefited his character and health, the nephew could not recover.
B) That no consideration was involved, and the nephew could not recover because the consideration from him did not consist of money or goods.
C) That no consideration was involved, and the nephew could not recover because the proof established that the nephew had no interest in engaging in the items at issue, and avoiding them was no detriment to him.
D) That the nephew could recover because he supplied consideration.
E) That the nephew could recover, but only under promissory estoppel an amount compensating him for his reliance on the promise.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q8: Assuming no exception applies, which of the
Q46: Assuming no exception applies, which of the
Q48: A promise to do something that you
Q53: In a[n] _ debt,the parties either dispute
Q53: Which of the following is true regarding
Q55: Which of the following is true regarding
Q58: In a[n] _ debt,there is no dispute
Q60: Which of the following occurs when three
Q61: In some cases,if past consideration was given
Q80: Which of the following is true regarding