Multiple Choice
What was the final result on appeal in the Case Opener involving whether the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur applied to the lawsuit brought against landowners after the plaintiff fell through a wooden dock located on the defendants' property?
A) That the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur applied.
B) That the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur did not apply because there was insufficient proof that the type of accident at issue would not normally happen in the absence of negligence.
C) That the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur did not apply because there was insufficient proof that the dock at issue was in the exclusive control of the defendants.
D) That the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur did not apply because it only applies in contractual cases.
E) That whether or not the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur applied should be decided by the jury.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q40: Which of the following are elements of
Q41: Which is the most difficult part of
Q42: Which of the following is true regarding
Q44: Upon which of the following theories will
Q46: Assumption of the risk is a doctrine
Q48: Which of the following is true regarding
Q50: Which of the following is an example
Q58: Identify and discuss the two separate elements
Q72: Under which of the following does the
Q76: Which of the following refers to the