Essay
Randy,an avid hunter,wishes to build a hunting cabin to use with a companion during hunting season.He travelled around the area and found a farm that had an ideal piece of land.Randy telephoned the farmer and asked to meet him over coffee.Bob,the farmer,decided to sell Randy the lot for $3,000.Randy agreed,handing Bob $500 in cash as a deposit.When Randy arrived for hunting season,three months later having erected a cabin in the summer,he offered Bob another $1,000 toward the purchase price.However,Bob has decided that he no longer wishes to sell the land,and informs Randy he will have to tear down his building.Bob tells Randy that he can do this because they did not have a written agreement.
Apply the four criteria of the doctrine of part performance to the circumstances and explain their relevance to both Randy's arguments and Bob's defence.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: An expert landscape architect,known for special skill
Q1: Given the degree to which courts are
Q3: Sara purchased an old glass vase that
Q4: Susan,who is functionally illiterate,asks her friend Jane
Q8: Bildit Construction Co.was building a large condominium
Q9: The Auto Garage advertised vehicle repairs by
Q10: Sarah is suing her lawyer,Tom Takeitall,for the
Q11: John was indebted to Stan on a
Q24: Audrey agrees verbally to do some repair
Q35: Hammond sells her house to Mendoza for