Essay
The case of Donaghue v. Stevenson represented a dramatic change in the law regarding defective products. Discuss the similarities and differences between the legal principles established by this case and the operation of modern legislation in this area.
D. v. S., an injured consumer may sue a manufacturer for damages suffered
- Under federal legislation (Food and Drugs Act and Hazardous Products Act), strict liability and penalties are imposed on manufacturers in breach of the Acts' provisions
- The purpose of the legislation is to protect the public from harm but not to compensate injured consumers, its role being regulatory as well as criminal
- Manufacturers may be required to pay penalties for breaches of the legislation whether any injury occurred or not
Correct Answer:

Verified
Donaghue v. Stevenson and Consumer Safet...View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q36: Consumer protection in respect of credit aims
Q37: Phil entered into an agreement with Marina
Q38: Intending to purchase laundry detergent, Wendy went
Q39: The Strong Arm Collection Agency had a
Q40: Six months ago, Henri's consumer debt of
Q42: Sale of Goods Act warranties and conditions
Q43: Phil entered into an agreement with Marina
Q44: Six months ago, Henri's consumer debt of
Q45: Info Services Ltd. in Regina is a
Q46: Jelly candies are shaped like rounded-off coffee