Multiple Choice
In 2004,Ned bought two hectares in Richmond.In 2014,he subdivided the property,keeping Lot A for himself and selling Lot B to Weerdt.Ned also retained a right of way along one side of Lot B to permit access to the road.Another term of the contract required Weerdt to plant a row of poplar trees along the boundary with Lot A within two months of the sale.Both covenants were registered.Weerdt took possession and soon built a small motorcross course near Ned's lot where he and his friends practised on their unmuffled dirt bikes,during which times Ned was unable to use his backyard because of the noise.Weerdt hauled the cycles around in his truck,which he often parked either on Ned's property or in the right of way,blocking Ned's passage.Weerdt never did plant the trees.Based on these facts,which one of the following is false?
A) Ned could sue Weerdt for the tort of nuisance.
B) Ned could secretly place strips of spikes on his property to deflate the tires of those who trespassed on his property.
C) Ned could ask for an injunction as a remedy.
D) Ned could sue Weerdt for interference with his right of way.
E) Ned could sue Weerdt for breach of contract.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q86: Explain who is liable for paying for
Q87: Explain what is meant by the equity
Q89: A lease longer than three years must
Q91: Most provinces have set up environmental protection
Q92: In January 2012,Adam sold his farm to
Q93: "When a tenant has signed a two-year
Q93: Joe was walking in a park and
Q94: In the context of residential tenancies,a tenant's
Q95: Environmental legislation is not concerned with which
Q234: The only person who has a better