Multiple Choice
The private right to sue for private nuisance was reinforced with the Supreme Court of Canada decision in St.Lawrence Cement Inc.v.Barrette in Quebec.Which of the following is incorrect related to this case?
A) The court gave a broader definition to neighbour,giving all of the people affected the right of action.
B) The common law doctrine of nuisance would have led to a different decision.
C) This action went forward as a class action,allowing the burden of bringing action to be spread much more widely.
D) As a result of this case,private nuisance is a much more effective tool.
E) St.Lawrence Cement Inc.was found liable.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q4: Distinguish between a tenancy in common and
Q15: Maab owns a small pet shop.He carries
Q16: Harry's lawn mower ceased to work,and in
Q17: Late one night,Mr.Kane found a duffle bag
Q18: Life insurance provides compensation to named beneficiaries
Q20: When one person leaves tangible personal property
Q22: Which of the following statements is correct
Q24: Explain what is foreclosed in the foreclosure
Q52: Explain what is meant by an insurable
Q87: The separation or division of joint ownership