Multiple Choice
Joe R.notified his partners in writing that he would be retiring from the business partnership at the end of 2013.It was acknowledged and agreed upon and,at year-end,the remaining partners paid him for his interest in the partnership.In February 2014,one of the remaining partners misapplied some trust funds that a long-time client had placed in the care of the partnership for the purchase of a hotel.The partnership was sued,but the assets of the partnership were not sufficient to satisfy the judgment.The successful plaintiff went against the personal assets of the partners,including those of Joe R.What is the likely outcome?
A) Joe R.is not liable because he had retired from the partnership at year-end and had properly notified his partners.
B) Joe R.is not liable because he had nothing whatsoever to do with the misapplication of the trust money.
C) Joe R.is not liable since he was not a partner when the misapplication happened.
D) Joe R.is only liable for his share of the losses even if the other partners don't have the assets to pay.
E) Joe R.is liable if he failed to give proper notice to outsiders,namely,the long-time client whose funds were misapplied.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q55: Often shareholders in closely held corporations want
Q56: A franchisee provides the product,equipment,and a licence
Q57: In which of the following is there
Q58: Joe and Sam were in business school
Q59: Which of the following statements is correct
Q61: ABC Ltd.is a closely held corporation.Two of
Q62: If three partners set out a term
Q63: Mrs.Marine was a director of a major
Q80: Explain the power of a minority shareholder
Q134: Explain why the law of partnership poses