Multiple Choice
Back in the days when people in Vancouver sold houses as houses and not for demolition,Mrs.Reid prepared her house for the market by contracting with Silversteps Ltd.to have her front steps replaced for the sum of $800.Warren,an employee of the company,worked for days framing the stairs and pouring the concrete.Unfortunately,he had done the framing wrong and,in addition,the concrete mix was faulty,so all of his efforts were in vain; the stairs were worthless.On these facts,which of the following is true?
A) Mrs.Reid could successfully sue the manufacturer of the cement for breach of contract because the cement was not fit for its purpose.
B) Mrs.Reid could successfully sue only Silversteps Ltd.for breach of contract.
C) Mrs.Reid could successfully sue Silversteps Ltd.for breach of contract or Warren for breach of contract,but not both.
D) If Silversteps Ltd.failed to pay Warren under the employment contract,Warren could sue Mrs.Reid directly for his pay because he worked on her stairs.
E) Mrs.Reid could successfully sue both Silversteps Ltd.and Warren for breach of contract because they were both connected with the job.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q95: Which of the following situations gives rise
Q96: What does an innocent party to an
Q97: If a warranty in a contract is
Q101: Which of the following is true with
Q103: Which of the following is true with
Q104: With regard to exemption clauses,which of the
Q107: When there is clear evidence that both
Q113: A condition precedent is a term of
Q126: For a contract to be ended by
Q133: Duress takes place when one person takes