Multiple Choice
Ellis agreed to paint Lee's house for a price of $1500.A month before the performance was due,Lee called and told Ellis that she had changed her mind and was going to have her house restuccoed instead.Ellis insisted that they had a contract and that he was going to paint the house anyway.Lee repeated that she was not going to go through with it,but Ellis insisted that the contract was still on.Before further steps could be taken by either party,Lee's house was destroyed by a freak airplane accident.Which one of the following statements describes the law applicable to these facts?
A) Ellis will be able to successfully claim as damages the amount that he would have made if the contract had been performed.
B) Ellis's conduct amounted to repudiation,and Lee could have sued for breach of contract immediately after the phone call.
C) Lee's conduct did not amount to a breach since she told him a month before performance was due that she didn't want the house painted.
D) Lee could have accepted Ellis's conduct as an anticipatory breach.
E) The contract has been discharged by frustration.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q37: What is the effect of a court
Q58: When a negotiable instrument is used, the
Q75: The effect of the doctrine of substantial
Q77: Randal embezzled $6000 of his employer's money
Q78: Jenny went to the store and asked
Q80: William enters into an agreement with Phyllis
Q82: A woman sought to set aside a
Q83: Which of the following is an example
Q84: Mr.and Mrs.H were induced to sign a
Q88: For a contract to be frustrated, performance