Essay
Females,on average,are shorter and weigh less than males.One of your friends,who is a pre-med student,tells you that in addition,females will weigh less for a given height.To test this hypothesis,you collect height and weight of 29 female and 81 male students at your university.A regression of the weight on a constant,height,and a binary variable,which takes a value of one for females and is zero otherwise,yields the following result: = -229.21 - 6.36 × Female + 5.58 × Height,
=0.50,SER = 20.99
where Studentw is weight measured in pounds and Height is measured in inches.
(a)Interpret the results.Does it make sense to have a negative intercept?
(b)You decide that in order to give an interpretation to the intercept you should rescale the height variable.One possibility is to subtract 5 ft.or 60 inches from your Height,because the minimum height in your data set is 62 inches.The resulting new intercept is now 105.58.Can you interpret this number now? Do you thing that the regression has changed? What about the standard error of the regression?
(c)You have learned that correlation does not imply causation.Although this is true mathematically,does this always apply?
Correct Answer:

Verified
(a)For every additional inch in height,w...View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q1: When there are omitted variables in the
Q8: You would like to find the effect
Q9: (Requires Calculus)For the simple linear regression model
Q11: You have collected data for 104 countries
Q13: In the process of collecting weight and
Q14: You have collected a sub-sample from the
Q15: Omitted variable bias<br>A)will always be present as
Q16: The adjusted R2,or <img src="https://d2lvgg3v3hfg70.cloudfront.net/TB2833/.jpg" alt="The adjusted
Q29: Your econometrics textbook stated that there will
Q48: One of your peers wants to analyze