Essay
In this case,the Granger causality statistic does not exceed the critical value,and hence the conclusion is that the change in the inflation rate does not Granger-cause the unemployment rate. t = 0.05 - 0.31 ΔInft-1
(0.14)(0.07)
t = 1982:I - 2009:IV,R2 = 0.10,SER = 2.4
a.Calculate the one-quarter-ahead forecast of both ΔInf2010:I and Inf2010:I (the inflation rate in 2009:IV was 2.6 percent,and the change in the inflation rate for that quarter was -1.04).
b.Calculate the forecast for 2010:II using the iterated multiperiod AR forecast both for the change in the inflation rate and the inflation rate.
c.What alternative method could you have used to forecast two quarters ahead? Write down the equation for the two-period ahead forecast,using parameters instead of numerical coefficients,which you would have used.
Correct Answer:

Verified
a.
2010:I|2009:IV = 0.05 - 0.31 ΔInf200...View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q2: Δ2Yt<br>A)= ΔYt - ΔYt-1.<br>B)= <img src="https://d2lvgg3v3hfg70.cloudfront.net/TB2833/.jpg" alt="Δ2Yt
Q4: Using the ADL(1,1)regression Yt = β0 +
Q4: Volatility clustering<br>A)is evident in most cross-sections.<br>B)implies that
Q5: The DOLS estimator has the following property
Q5: Some macroeconomic theories suggest that there is
Q9: If Xt and Yt are cointegrated,then the
Q10: Consider the following model Yt = β0
Q29: The EG-ADF test<br>A)is the similar to the
Q44: The biggest conceptual difference between using VARs
Q50: You can determine the lag lengths in