Multiple Choice
Monroe sold computers. On the purchase of a new IBM computer the buyer signed the written contract that contained the following clause: "The seller is not liable for any breach of condition or warranty express or implied in this contract." The buyer was a businessman who intended to use the machine in his business for a while and then resell it. The machine was used properly but didn't operate well, and within one week it would not work at all. Monroe refused to take back the machine or to refund any money by relying on the exemption clause. Which of the following would be the buyer's best argument for avoiding the effect of the exemption clause in this case?
A) The buyer had no notice of the clause; therefore, it is not a term of the contract.
B) There is a breach of a non-essential term of the contract.
C) There is a fundamental breach of contract.
D) Such clauses are prohibited under contract law and are therefore void.
E) On a narrow interpretation of the words used in the exemption clause, they do not cover his complaint.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q21: Joe agreed to buy a car from
Q41: A breach of warranty will bring the
Q47: A condition precedent is an example of
Q50: Which one of the following does not
Q53: Which of the following is true with
Q54: A term in a contract that says
Q56: Cleo entered into a contract with Harvey
Q57: Alan entered into a written contract for
Q58: In the case of an anticipatory breach<br>A)
Q134: What is a force majeure clause?