Multiple Choice
Dubocovich had contracted to supply a health-food store with jars of Melatonin, a hormone reported in the media as a miracle potion. After they contracted, but before delivery, the government banned the sale of Melatonin so that it could be properly tested under government auspices. Dubocovich told the owner of the store, Mr. Wei, that he wouldn't be delivering the Melatonin because of the government ban. The demand for the Melatonin was high. Mr. Wei was very upset with Dubocovich for failing to honour his contractual obligations. Furthermore, he had given Dubocovich $5,000 in advance, which Dubocovich needed and used to pay the freight costs in bringing the drug to his warehouse. Wei sued Dubocovich for breach of contract. Which of the following is correct with respect to the legal position of the parties?
A) This is an example of a frustrated contract and Wei will lose, since the loss will remain where it has fallen.
B) When a contract is frustrated in this way, the frustrating party is responsible for any losses incurred by the other party.
C) Wei will be successful in his breach of contract action.
D) The contract is illegal and void.
E) Wei will be able to get back his $5,000 minus a portion of any costs Dubocovich incurred in preparing to perform the contract.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q4: When a court determines that a breach
Q10: When a contract has been performed in
Q30: A contract is terminated by agreement in
Q33: Which one of the following statements accurately
Q39: In which of the following is the
Q81: Explain what is meant by an anticipatory
Q89: When a condition is breached, the victim
Q92: What is the usual impact of an
Q141: When faced with an anticipatory breach, what
Q157: When one party is responsible for an