Multiple Choice
The case of Sail Labrador Ltd. v. Challenger One (The) involved an option to purchase and a breach of a contract that was inconsequential and immediately corrected. What did the Supreme Court of Canada hold?
A) The contract had been substantially performed and the option was still available.
B) The breach, although minor, rendered the contract unenforceable.
C) No breach can be considered inconsequential at law.
D) The contract had not been perfectly performed, so the contract was void.
E) The breach, although minor, rendered the contract voidable at the option of the non-breaching party.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q6: Tufts and McDougal were having an argument
Q8: In all but one of the following
Q10: Which one of the following statements accurately
Q31: A breaching party is responsible for all
Q53: Legal tender in Canada consists of government-produced
Q71: What is the three-part test for determining
Q84: When an outside, unforeseen event interferes with
Q91: Discuss the equitable remedies that were developed
Q126: For a contract to be ended by
Q149: All rules of contract formation apply when