Multiple Choice
The case of Shelanu Inc. v. Print Three Franchising Corporation involved a case whether a franchisor had a duty of good faith to the franchisee. What did the Court of Appeal hold?
A) The breach was considered inconsequential at law.
B) The plaintiff was not entitled to terminate the franchise agreement since the franchisor had not breached their duty of good faith.
C) The plaintiff was entitled to terminate the franchise agreement since the franchisor had breached their duty of good faith.
D) The plaintiff was entitled to terminate the franchise agreement since there was no breach of the duty of good faith.
E) The plaintiff was entitled to terminate the franchise agreement since there was a breach of the duty of good faith.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q42: A condition subsequent is an example of
Q70: Which of the following is false with
Q71: Which of the following is true with
Q73: Which of the following would most likely
Q74: Which of the following is false with
Q75: Explain the injunction as it is available
Q78: In which one of the following instances
Q79: Which one of the following statements accurately
Q80: Harry agreed to make a new violin
Q156: Distinguish between a down payment and a