Multiple Choice
Len was behind in his work at the office. He decided to go in for a few hours on Sunday to catch up. He asked a secretary to come in for four hours. He turned on his office TV. Just then his secretary came in and asked him to sign four letters that she said concerned general office matters. He carelessly signed them without taking his eyes off the TV screen. One of the "letters" was, in fact, a cheque for $500 payable to the secretary. The secretary cashed the cheque at her bank, and when her bank presented the cheque for payment, Len instructed his bank not to honour it. He said that he had been tricked and that his signing it was all a big mistake. On these facts, which of the following is true?
A) He could avoid his obligation on the cheque on the basis of duress.
B) He could avoid his obligation on the cheque on the basis of unconscionability.
C) Because Len did not know what he was signing, he cannot be held liable.
D) Len's carelessness in failing to read what he was signing will likely defeat any claim of non est factum.
E) Undue influence would be his best defence on these facts.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q33: What does it mean that an assignee
Q61: In Rochdale Credit Union v. Barney, a
Q61: Explain what is meant by a collateral
Q65: In Sylvan Lake Golf & Tennis Club
Q67: In Moss v. Chin, Chin's insurer, ICBC,
Q74: For a contract to be unconscionable, it
Q107: When there is clear evidence that both
Q124: What is the term used to describe
Q133: Duress takes place when one person takes
Q173: The victim of intentional misrepresentation can sue