Multiple Choice
Mr. and Mrs. H were induced to sign a mortgage in favour of M Co. Ltd. by Johnston, a man living with their daughter. Johnston led them to believe that the document was an unimportant amendment to an existing mortgage, when in reality, it was a second substantial mortgage of their home. Neither read the document nor questioned it. When the payments were in arrears, the mortgagee took an action for foreclosure (to take their home) . Which of the following is correct with respect to the legal position of the parties?
A) If the court finds that Johnston has committed a fraudulent misrepresentation, Mr. and Mrs. H will not have to honour the mortgage.
B) If the court finds that this is an example of duress by Johnston, Mr. and Mrs. H will not have to honour the mortgage.
C) If the court finds that this is an example of undue influence by Johnston, Mr. and Mrs. H will not have to honour the mortgage.
D) If Mr. and Mrs. H can show they didn't read the document, they will not have to honour the mortgage contract.
E) They will likely have to honour the mortgage contract even though they didn't read it.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q4: Distinguish between innocent and fraudulent misrepresentation, indicating
Q7: Correction by the court of the wording
Q27: With regard to the law governing privity
Q31: A salesman innocently misrepresented a fact to
Q33: A woman sought to set aside a
Q34: In 978011 Ontario Ltd. v. Cornell Engineering
Q36: Clive and Bill were not friends but
Q37: In which of the following would the
Q64: To avoid a contract on the basis
Q113: Explain what is meant by unjust enrichment.