Multiple Choice
Kassem was a real estate agent with his own firm. Because his agency was new in a competitive field, he hired the company of Barrett and Barrett Ltd. to advise on an advertising strategy and to design ads for the newspaper and for brochures. Jack Barrett, senior employee, was handling the market research, and the employee Armstrong was doing the illustrations. When the work was complete, the ads went to press; unfortunately, after the printing, it was discovered that in all the ads and in every brochure "Kassem" was spelled "Kassim." Armstrong had made the mistake in his copy. On these facts, which of the following is true?
A) For breach of contract, Kassem could successfully sue only the company, Barrett and Barrett Ltd.
B) Kassem's only recourse is against Armstrong, the employee who made the mistake.
C) Kassem can sue both the company and its employee Armstrong for breach of contract, since they were both connected with the job.
D) Kassem can choose to sue either the company or its employee Armstrong for breach of contract, but not both.
E) If the company did not pay Armstrong, Armstrong could sue Kassem for his pay because Armstrong did do work for Kassem.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q22: Explain what is meant by an "involuntary
Q49: Indicate under which circumstances the remedy of
Q66: In order to succeed in suing for
Q69: Explain what is meant by "privity of
Q118: Outline the restrictions on the ability of
Q124: The Weyburn Farmers' Co-op contracted to sell
Q124: Joe owned an apartment building and entered
Q126: According to Woods v. Hubley, a transaction
Q130: In the case Whighton v. Integrity Inspections
Q132: Keri went to Crandon's computer outlet with