Multiple Choice
Back in the days when people in Vancouver sold houses as houses and not for demolition, Mrs. Reid prepared her house for the market by contracting with Silversteps Ltd. to have her front steps replaced for the sum of $800. Warren, an employee of the company, worked for days framing the stairs and pouring the concrete. Unfortunately, he had done the framing wrong and, in addition, the concrete mix was faulty, so all of his efforts were in vain; the stairs were worthless. On these facts, which of the following is true?
A) Mrs. Reid could successfully sue the manufacturer of the cement for breach of contract because the cement was not fit for its purpose.
B) Mrs. Reid could successfully sue only Silversteps Ltd. for breach of contract.
C) Mrs. Reid could successfully sue both Silversteps Ltd. and Warren for breach of contract because they were both connected with the job.
D) If Silversteps Ltd. failed to pay Warren under the employment contract, Warren could sue Mrs. Reid directly for his pay because he worked on her stairs.
E) Mrs. Reid could successfully sue only Silversteps Ltd. for breach of contract or Warren for breach of contract but not both.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q2: What is the significance of an assignment
Q28: Distinguish between duress and undue influence.
Q29: Explain the impact of the principle of
Q75: Selling the contents of the house in
Q78: Explain what is meant by a "chose
Q79: Joe,a student at the local college,had a
Q80: Which of the following is true with
Q89: Discuss the principle of caveat emptor and
Q125: The original party cannot enforce a contract
Q165: Explain why agency is not really an