Multiple Choice
A woman forged her husband's signature on dozens of cheques. In an attempt to protect her from prosecution, the husband signed a letter prepared by the Bank agreeing to assume all liability for the forged cheques. What would the Court find in relation to this agreement?
A) As an agreement to stifle a criminal prosecution, it was an illegal contract and therefore void.
B) The agreement was unenforceable because the Bank lacked capacity to enter into such an agreement.
C) Because the husband acted improperly, the agreement was voidable by the Bank on the basis of illegality.
D) While the Bank acted improperly, "freedom to contract" establishes that the agreement must be enforced.
E) The agreement was unenforceable because the husband was under duress at the time he signed it.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q60: If a person says that he had
Q64: Joe saw an ad in a paper
Q68: Which of the following types of contracts
Q72: Contracts may be in writing, under seal,
Q73: Which of the following statements is correct
Q117: The nature of the legislation governing incorporation
Q143: What must a person establish in order
Q148: All contracts must be written to be
Q153: What is the term used when a
Q160: What is the term for a written