Multiple Choice
Mr. Holden, a program developer, had a successful business helping small firms and shops computerize their businesses. In his spare time, he developed software for inventory control that was superior to others on the market. He launched an ad campaign and all went well for several months until a competitor came out with a cheaper program. In time, he could not pay his debts when they became due and owing. A supplier sued for damages and was awarded $21,000. Holden did not pay. With regard to the supplier's position at this time, which of the following is false?
A) The supplier could get a government official to seize and sell enough of Holden's property to satisfy the debt.
B) The supplier could examine Holden under oath about his assets and sources of income.
C) The supplier could have a garnishee order served on Holden's bank, ordering the bank to pay money into court instead of to Holden.
D) Since the decision is in his favour, the supplier would be a judgment creditor, Holden, a judgment debtor.
E) The supplier could obtain a writ of execution that directs a court official to seize Holden and detain him in court until he arranges payment.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q18: When one person is suing another in
Q46: A case in which one person sues
Q55: In a criminal matter, the judge must
Q111: Discuss what constitutes a fair hearing.
Q114: Mandamus involves the decision maker being required
Q207: June was driving her car home after
Q208: When,in an assault case,the court has to
Q210: Discuss the options that are available to
Q211: In Baker v. Canada, the Supreme Court
Q212: Which of the following is correct with