In Ahumada V

Multiple Choice

In Ahumada v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) , what did the Federal Court of Appeal decide was the test for bias in those circumstances?

A) Is there clear evidence proving bias beyond all reasonable doubt?
B) Would a reasonable person informed of the facts think it more likely than not that the tribunal was biased?
C) Considering the matter subjectively, would a panel member have believed he or she was capable of bias at the time of the decision?
D) Did the person alleging actually feel that the tribunal was biased?
E) Did the tribunal willfully and deliberately make a decision from a position of bias?