Solved

Chez Paul Is Contemplating Either Opening Another Restaurant or Expanding

Question 33

Essay

Chez Paul is contemplating either opening another restaurant or expanding its existing location.The payoff table for these two decisions is:
Paul has calculated the indifference probability for the lottery having a payoff of $160,000 with probability p and −$80,000 with probability (1−p)as follows:
Chez Paul is contemplating either opening another restaurant or expanding its existing location.The payoff table for these two decisions is: Paul has calculated the indifference probability for the lottery having a payoff of $160,000 with probability p and −$80,000 with probability (1−p)as follows: a.Is Paul a risk avoider,a risk taker,or risk neutral? b.Suppose Paul has defined the utility of −$80,000 to be 0 and the utility of $160,000 to be 80.What would be the utility values for −$40,000,$20,000,and $100,000 based on the indifference probabilities? c.Suppose P(s<sub>1</sub>)= .4,P(s<sub>2</sub>)= .3,and P(s<sub>3</sub>)= .3.Which decision should Paul make? Compare with the decision using the expected value approach. Chez Paul is contemplating either opening another restaurant or expanding its existing location.The payoff table for these two decisions is: Paul has calculated the indifference probability for the lottery having a payoff of $160,000 with probability p and −$80,000 with probability (1−p)as follows: a.Is Paul a risk avoider,a risk taker,or risk neutral? b.Suppose Paul has defined the utility of −$80,000 to be 0 and the utility of $160,000 to be 80.What would be the utility values for −$40,000,$20,000,and $100,000 based on the indifference probabilities? c.Suppose P(s<sub>1</sub>)= .4,P(s<sub>2</sub>)= .3,and P(s<sub>3</sub>)= .3.Which decision should Paul make? Compare with the decision using the expected value approach.
a.Is Paul a risk avoider,a risk taker,or risk neutral?
b.Suppose Paul has defined the utility of −$80,000 to be 0 and the utility of $160,000 to be 80.What would be the utility values for −$40,000,$20,000,and $100,000 based on the indifference probabilities?
c.Suppose P(s1)= .4,P(s2)= .3,and P(s3)= .3.Which decision should Paul make? Compare with the decision using the expected value approach.

Correct Answer:

verifed

Verified

a. Arisk ...

View Answer

Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge

Related Questions

Q8: For a two-person,zero-sum,mixed-strategy game,each player selects its

Q28: Game theory models extend beyond two-person,zero-sum games.Discuss

Q30: For a two-person zero-sum game,which one of

Q32: The logic of game theory assumes that

Q34: The Dollar Department Store chain has

Q35: Which of the following statements about a

Q49: ​The risk neutral decision maker will have

Q73: ​When the payoffs become extreme, most decision

Q83: ​When consequences are measured on a scale

Q90: ​The probability for which a decision maker