Multiple Choice
In CASE 22.1 Securities and Exchange Commission v.Texas Gulf Sulphur Co.(1971) ,the question was whether a press release giving a misleading impression about the results of a drilling operation violated Rule 10b-5.How did the court rule?
A) The company acted only in response to rumors and had no obligation to set forth additional facts regarding the drilling operation,thereby negating any basis for Rule 10b-5 liability.
B) The company violated Rule 10b-5 by issuing the misleading press release.
C) A press release standing alone may not violate Rule 10b-5,and the company could not be held liable because it made no actionable statements outside the press release.
D) The company could be held liable under Rule 10b-5 but only because it issued other statements in addition to the press release.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q41: Under the blue sky laws in certain
Q42: Under the efficient capital market hypothesis,in an
Q43: In order to be actionable under Rule
Q44: A securities fraud claim can be used
Q45: Under Section 16(b)pertaining to short-swing profits,a person
Q47: A right of action under section 10(b)may
Q48: The Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge Act
Q49: The safe harbor provision applies to forward-looking
Q50: Temporary insiders are persons not directly employed
Q51: A controlling shareholder is traditionally considered an