Multiple Choice
In CASE 8.2,MacNeil Automotive Products,Ltd.v.Cannon Automotive,Ltd.(2010) ,MacNeil subcontracted with Canon Automotive to provide floor mats on automobiles.MacNeil claimed the mats were defective and breached the express warranty.What was the main question before the court?
A) Did the sales talk constitute an implied warranty for fitness of purpose?
B) Did the sales talk constitute an implied warranty of merchantability?
C) Was the sales talk puffery or an express warranty?
D) Did the sales talk properly disclaim all express warranties?
Correct Answer:
Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q25: The UCC regulates sales of goods by
Q26: According to the UCC,if no amount of
Q27: Many states have applied Article 2 of
Q28: Unless the parties opt out of its
Q29: Panya sold Jody a used car for
Q31: Efforts to create a comprehensive uniform state
Q32: Which of the following is true regarding
Q33: If parties to a contract dispute a
Q34: The implied warranty of fitness for a
Q35: Between merchants,what is the effect of an