Essay
You are the chief appraiser for a large art dealer in a major American city. You are offered a chance to examine, and buy, a work of art. You have reason to believe that it is a piece from a famous artist of the 15th century that has been lost to the art world for hundreds of years. Such a painting would have an estimated market value of $1 million. However, you face two risks. First, the painting may be a forgery, a chance that you estimate to be .4. Second, even if the painting is authentic it may be stolen. Once you buy the painting, you bear all risk. If it is a fake, its value is $0. If it proves to be stolen (a .2 risk in your estimation), you must return the painting to its rightful owner and you cannot recover the purchase price.
(a) You have the chance to buy the painting for $500,000. As a risk-neutral decision maker, should you make the purchase?
(b) Suppose you can buy insurance against the risk of theft. You pay a premium of $20,000, and the insurance company compensates you according to your purchase price if the work proves to be stolen. Should you buy the painting for $500,000?
Correct Answer:

Verified
The second decision tree is similar to t...View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q31: Which of the following is a feature
Q32: Define uncertainty with an example.
Q33: The following is the distribution of
Q34: Based on the following utility schedule
Q35: A firm must decide whether to launch
Q37: Consider a situation where an insurance contract
Q38: An individual is risk neutral if her
Q39: An individual has a utility of money
Q40: A manager's utility of money schedule
Q41: A manager reveals that she has a