Deck 6: Police and the Constitution the Rules of Law Enforcement

Full screen (f)
exit full mode
Question
One of the critical legal concepts of the Fourth Amendment is the prohibition against _____.

A) unreasonable searches and seizures
B) establishing probable cause
C) the inevitable discovery exception
D) corporal punishment
Use Space or
up arrow
down arrow
to flip the card.
Question
When police are conducting a search or seizure, they:

A) must be reasonable.
B) have absolute discretion.
C) can apply probable cause retroactively.
D) must not carry arms.
Question
Before going to a judge to ask for a search warrant, law enforcement officers must prepare a(n) _____ in which they provide specific, written information on the property that they wish to search and seize.

A) deposition
B) affidavit
C) injunction
D) apostille
Question
To acquire a search warrant, a law enforcement officer must:

A) have information showing probable cause that a crime has been or will be committed.
B) first arrest the suspect.
C) gather information that shows the age, intelligence, and physical condition of the suspect.
D) get the consent from the individual who must be searched.
Question
According to the Fourth Amendment, a search warrant must:

A) be transferable among bordering states if a suspected criminal is out of jurisdiction.
B) be used for searches and seizures within five days of issuing.
C) describe with particularity the place to be searched and the things to be seized.
D) have a clause to apply probable cause retroactively.
Question
Under the private search doctrine, _____.

A) an officer is allowed to conduct a search based on suspicion
B) an individual can seek privacy only within the confines of his or her dwelling
C) even after a private search has taken place, the owner of the searched items can have a reasonable expectation of privacy
D) law enforcement officers do not need a warrant to go through personal items that have already been searched by a third-party civilian
Question
To understand the rules for policing set down in the U.S. Constitution and enforced by the courts, law enforcement officers must understand _____.

A) the Seventeenth Amendment
B) the Eleventh Amendment
C) the Fourth Amendment
D) the First Amendment
Question
Which of the following statements is true about the Supreme Court ruling in Rodriguez v. United States ?

A) The Court ruled that the Nebraska police officer had overstepped the boundaries of his authority.
B) The Court held that the judicial determination of probable cause must be made within forty-eight hours after the arrest.
C) The Court ruled that the Nebraska police officer had the right to search Rodriguez's vehicle without a warrant on the grounds of probable cause.
D) The Court held that the Fourth Amendment protects people, not vehicles, houses, papers, and effects.
Question
Which of the following statements is true of the private search doctrine?

A) A private search eliminates an owner's reasonable expectation of privacy regarding the object searched.
B) An individual loses the right to privacy once he or she has committed a heinous crime.
C) An individual may seek privacy only within the confines of his or her dwelling.
D) A private search does not eliminate the need to establish a probable cause to secure a search warrant.
Question
In the context of the rules of law enforcement, a(n) _____ is the act of taking possession of a person or property by the government because of a (suspected) violation of the law.

A) deposition
B) seizure
C) injunction
D) frisk
Question
Which of the following is a component of the two-pronged test set by Justice John Harlan, Jr., for a person's expectation of privacy?

A) An individual must prove that he or she expected privacy.
B) Society's recognition of expectation of privacy as reasonable or unreasonable is irrelevant.
C) An individual may not seek privacy in a public place.
D) A person can expect privacy even if evidence is in plain view.
Question
Which of the following statements is true of the burden of probable cause?

A) It cannot be established on the basis of information from an informant.
B) It requires more than mere suspicion on a police officer's part.
C) It prohibits the use of an affidavit before seeking a search warrant.
D) It requires police officers to obtain a warrant for consent searches.
Question
Among the sources that can establish probable cause, _____ is generally inadequate.

A) evidence in plain view
B) information
C) association
D) personal observation
Question
Seth, a law enforcement officer, suspected a person to be guilty of burglary. He found an eyewitness who saw the suspect leaving the burgled property. The declaration by the witness was enough to establish probable cause for a search warrant. In the given scenario, which of the following sources of probable cause did Seth use?

A) Information
B) Personal observation
C) Evidence
D) Association
Question
Brian, a police officer, acquired a search warrant for a man named Jacob. During the search, Brian found drugs in Jacob's house. However, Brian later found out that the warrant was for another man with the same name. A computer error had caused the mix-up, and at the time of the search, Brian was unaware of the error. The Court allowed the drug to be used as evidence although the warrant was technically invalid. The given scenario best exemplifies the _____.

A) "inevitable discovery" exception
B) exclusionary rule
C) plain view doctrine
D) "good faith" exception
Question
Which of the following is a critical legal concept pertaining to the Fourth Amendment?

A) The inevitable discovery exception
B) The requirement of a warrant for consent searches
C) The good faith exception
D) The requirement of probable cause to issue a warrant
Question
Historically, the courts have looked to the _____ for guidance in regulating the activity of law enforcement officers.

A) First Amendment
B) Fourth Amendment
C) Eleventh Amendment
D) Eighteenth Amendment
Question
In the context of the rules of law enforcement, a search is:

A) a governmental intrusion on a citizen's reasonable expectation of privacy.
B) the act of taking possession of a person or property by the government because of a violation of the law.
C) a brief detention of a person by law enforcement agents for questioning.
D) the act of apprehending a suspect for the purpose of detaining him or her on a criminal charge.
Question
The recognized standard for a "reasonable expectation of privacy" was established in:

A) United States v. Robinson (1973).
B) Chimel v. California (1969).
C) Katz v. United States (1967).
D) Carroll v. United States (1925).
Question
Simon is a homicide detective. While working on a case, he seized a knife from the defendant's house during an unwarranted search. His suspicion that the knife was the murder weapon was proved right by the lab results. However, because Simon failed to establish probable cause before conducting the search, the court did not allow the knife to be submitted as evidence. In the given scenario, the court most likely exercised the _____.

A) inevitable discovery exception
B) exclusionary rule
C) good faith exception
D) plain view doctrine
Question
Justin, a cop, stopped a car that was speeding on the freeway. When he approached the car, he saw a couple of vials of marijuana kept on the passenger seat. Justin asked the driver to step out of the vehicle and seized the vials from the car. In the given scenario, Justin did not possess a warrant, but his act of seizing the vials is justified under the _____.

A) automobile exception
B) exclusionary rule
C) good faith exception
D) plain view doctrine
Question
The precedent for the ever-elusive definition of a "reasonable" suspicion in stop-and-frisk situations was established in _____.

A) Davis v. United States (1994)
B) Maryland v. Wilson (1997)
C) Miranda v. Arizona (1966)
D) Terry v. Ohio (1968)
Question
For a warrant for electronic surveillance to be valid, it:

A) does not need to show probable cause.
B) must name the technicians who will monitor the surveillance.
C) must detail with particularity the conversations that are to be overheard.
D) does not need to name the suspects as long as it names the places that will be under surveillance.
Question
_____ is a necessary part of an arrest that is considered to have occurred when an individual submits to the control of an officer either peacefully or under the threat or use of force.

A) Acquittal
B) Incrimination
C) Entrapment
D) Detention
Question
The Constitution, as interpreted by American courts, provides very little protection to evidence _____.

A) possessed by a witness
B) that is clear and convincing
C) in plain view
D) obtained illegally
Question
According to criminal justice professor Rolando V. del Carmen of Sam Houston State University, which of the following elements must be present for an arrest to take place?

A) The intent to arrest
B) The previous arrest record of the arrestee
C) The physical evidence pertinent to the crime
D) The consent of the arrestee
Question
Which of the following is established by the Fourth Amendment with regard to searches of automobiles?

A) Officers must obtain the consent of the driver before searching his or her automobile even if they have obtained a warrant for the search.
B) Officers do not require a warrant to search an automobile if they have probable cause to believe that it contains contraband.
C) Individuals caught for speeding will have to submit their vehicles for inspection without a warrant.
D) Individuals in a vehicle have the same reasonable expectation of privacy as someone at home.
Question
According to justices hearing the case of the discovery of 128 pounds of marijuana in a minivan in Arizona in 2002, which of the following police duties is part of the totality of the circumstances?

A) The need to electronically monitor specific dwellings
B) The need to exclude the elderly from routine stops
C) The need to prevent terrorist attacks
D) The need to give privacy to individuals at work
Question
In which of the following cases was the plain view doctrine first put forward by the Supreme Court?

A) Burger v. New York (1967)
B) Terry v. Ohio (1968)
C) Coolidge v. New Hampshire (1971)
D) Wilson v. Arkansas (1995)
Question
In general, law enforcement officers can use electronic surveillance only:

A) if the concerned parties refuse to agree for a consent search.
B) if the parties to be monitored are suspected of drug dealing.
C) if the judge refused to issue warrant on the basis of officers' suspicion.
D) if consent is given by one of the parties to be monitored.
Question
In which of the following cases can a police officer frisk an individual?

A) When the officer feels that frisking may reveal incriminating evidence
B) When the officer stops an individual at a public place
C) When the officer suspects that the individual is carrying drugs
D) When the officer is justified in thinking that the safety of police officers may be jeopardized
Question
In the context of searches with consent, which of the following is one of the most relevant factors in determining whether consent is voluntary?

A) The officers' belief that the location to be searched contains evidence
B) The length of the questioning and its location
C) The particularity of the conversations that are overheard
D) The type of offense committed in the presence of an officer
Question
Benjamin, a law enforcement officer, stops a car he suspects may have been involved in a hit-and-run case. The man driving the car pleads the Fifth Amendment. Which of the following does Benjamin have the right to do until further investigation?

A) Ask the driver to identify himself
B) Keep the driver in protective custody until a warrant can be obtained
C) Frisk the driver on grounds of suspicion
D) Arrest the driver for interrogation
Question
Devices that allow law enforcement agencies to expand their capabilities without a significant increase in personnel are known as _____.

A) task forces
B) force multipliers
C) rapid action forces
D) enforcers
Question
According to the ruling in California v. Riley (2014), the police:

A) can search cell phones as they are covered by the plain view doctrine.
B) do not need to establish probable cause before engaging in cell phone searches.
C) need a warrant before engaging in cell phone searches.
D) do not need the consent of a cell phone owner to conduct cell phone searches.
Question
In which of the following situations does the Fourth Amendment protect privacy?

A) When an officer uses a thermal imager to view items in a dwelling
B) When an individual is at a railway station with his luggage
C) When an individual discards certain goods by leaving it in a public place
D) When an officer finds incriminating evidence during a consent search
Question
In the context of searches incidental to arrests, which of the following is a police officer authorized to search without a warrant or additional probable cause?

A) A passenger traveling with a person who is a suspect
B) A group of individuals working at a suspect's workplace in his or her absence
C) A suspect's vehicle that is parked inside another person's house
D) An area within a suspect's immediate control
Question
Which of the following is an important circumstance in which a warrant is not needed?

A) When the police conduct consent searches
B) When the police have a suspicion
C) When the police conduct seizures
D) When the police search a suspect in a public place
Question
In the years since the Terry v. Ohio (1968) case was decided, the Court has settled on _____ to determine whether a stop is based on reasonable suspicion.

A) a totality of the circumstances test
B) the inevitable discovery exception
C) the exclusionary rule
D) a "good faith" exception
Question
Which of the following is a difference between a stop and an arrest?

A) A stop requires probable cause, whereas an arrest can be justified by reasonable suspicion.
B) An arrest is the act of apprehending a suspect for the purpose of detaining him or her, whereas a stop is a relatively brief intrusion on a citizen's rights.
C) A stop requires a warrant, whereas an arrest can be made without a warrant.
D) An officer intends to investigate suspicious activity during an arrest, whereas he or she intends to make a formal charge during a stop.
Question
_____ are situations in which law enforcement officers need not announce themselves before entering a dwelling, such as when they have a reasonable belief that a felony is being committed at the time of entering.

A) Exigent circumstances
B) Emergent circumstances
C) Total circumstances
D) Inevitable circumstances
Question
Which of the following aspects of a criminal investigation is strongly affected by the Miranda warning?

A) The seizure
B) The interrogation
C) The confiscation of evidence
D) The search
Question
In _____, the Court upheld the conviction of a suspect who claimed that he had invoked his Miranda rights by being mostly silent during questioning.

A) Berghuis v. Thompkins (2010)
B) Florida v. Jardines (2013)
C) Riverside v. McLaughlin (1991)
D) Brewer v. Williams (1977)
Question
In the context of interrogation, an admission refers to a:

A) statement in which the subject admits to committing the crime.
B) statement verifying information about some aspect of the underlying crime.
C) person's understanding that an arrest has taken place.
D) false confession by a person.
Question
Jason, a detective, obtained an arrest warrant for Warren. Jason went to Warren's house to take him into custody. Jason knocked at the door and announced his arrival several times. He then heard gun shots inside the house, and he broke in. In the given scenario, Jason's breaking in was admissible under _____.

A) the exclusionary rule
B) the inevitable discovery exception
C) exigent circumstances
D) mitigating circumstances
Question
Michelle, a homicide detective, is working on a murder case. She finds some information in the case file that leads her to suspect Derek, the victim's boyfriend. However, when she brings him in for interrogation, he refuses to answer any questions in the absence of his lawyer. In the given scenario, Derek is most likely exercising his _____.

A) Miranda rights
B) right to privacy
C) Garrity Rights
D) right to petition
Question
Which of the following statements is true about the Miranda warning?

A) It is not required during a stop and frisk, when no arrest has been made.
B) It is not required before a custodial interrogation takes place.
C) It is required when a person volunteers information before the police have asked a question.
D) It is required when the police are questioning witnesses at the scene of a crime.
Question
In which of the following cases can a law enforcement officer make a warrantless arrest?

A) When the suspect refuses to submit to a frisk during a routine traffic stop
B) When the officer suspects that the suspect is going to commit a crime in the near future
C) When the arrest warrant has been denied by a judge
D) When the offense is committed in the presence of the officer
Question
Which of the following is the recommended waiting period for police officers to enter a dwelling after knocking and announcing?

A) Three to five seconds
B) Fifteen to twenty seconds
C) At least three minutes
D) At least five minutes
Question
Which of the following has been offered as a means to promote police accountability?

A) The mandatory videotaping of interrogations
B) The mandatory wait period after knocking and announcing
C) The use of force multipliers
D) The good faith exception
Question
Who among the following has the authority to issue an arrest warrant?

A) Magistrates
B) Division chiefs
C) Commanders
D) Sheriffs
Question
In Hudson v. Michigan (2006), Detroit police did not knock before entering the defendant's home with a warrant. Instead, they announced themselves and waited for only three to five seconds before making their entrance. In this case, the Court stated that:

A) the search was inadmissible because the officers were not in hot pursuit.
B) improper knock and announce is not enough to disqualify evidence uncovered on the basis of a valid search warrant.
C) improper knock and announce is unreasonable enough to provide defendants with immunity under the Fourth Amendment.
D) because of exigent circumstances, the police officers did not need to announce themselves.
Question
According to law professor H. Richard Uviller, which of the following provides the basis for the Miranda rights?

A) Inherent coercion
B) Defamation
C) Exigent circumstances
D) Propaganda
Question
Which of the following was ruled by the Supreme Court as a result of the Miranda case?

A) A Miranda warning is not required if the police ask the suspect questions that are testimonial in nature.
B) Suspects can be seated in interrogation rooms for a few hours before questioning.
C) Every suspect needs protection from coercion.
D) Confessions are invalid if the suspect is aware of the Miranda warning.
Question
Brent, a police officer, has taken a suspect for interrogation after giving him the Miranda warning. The suspect invokes his Miranda rights and refuses to answer any questions. In the given scenario, Brent should:

A) release the suspect from custody until an attorney arrives.
B) immediately stop questioning the suspect.
C) use psychological duress to obtain a confession.
D) force him to confess.
Question
Which of the following statements best describes compliant false confessions?

A) A suspect is seeking attention or is delusional and thinks he or she did commit the crime.
B) A suspect is vaguely associated with a crime and gives false testimony against someone else.
C) A suspect is a vulnerable person-suffering from the stress of the interrogation-who comes to believe that he or she committed the crime.
D) A suspect knows he or she is innocent but decides-under police influence-that it is in his or her best interests to confess to the crime.
Question
Generally, Miranda requirements apply only when:

A) a suspect is forcefully detained or perceives that he or she is not free to leave the immediate vicinity.
B) the police have not focused on a suspect and are questioning witnesses at the scene of a crime.
C) a person volunteers information before the police have asked a question.
D) a person has been stopped and frisked without being arrested.
Question
Which of the following statements is true of an arrest warrant?

A) It does not give law enforcement officers the authority to enter a dwelling without first announcing themselves.
B) It does not require probable cause and can be issued based on the existing criminal record of a suspect.
C) It does not need to be specific about how many people will be arrested.
D) It does not specify the crime a person is suspected of having committed.
Question
Which of the following statements best describes internalized false confessions?

A) A suspect is seeking attention or is delusional and thinks he or she did commit the crime.
B) A suspect is vaguely associated with a crime and decides to take complete responsibility.
C) A suspect is a vulnerable person who comes to believe that he or she committed the crime.
D) A suspect knows he or she is innocent but decides that it is in his or her best interests to confess to the crime.
Question
For _____, the crime must have been committed in the presence of an officer for a warrantless arrest to be valid.

A) misdemeanors
B) arson
C) felonies
D) larceny
Question
Explain the exclusionary rule and the fruit of the poisoned tree. How do they impact police officers' investigations?
Question
In 2009, the Court extended the "stop-and-frisk" authority by ruling that a police officer could order a passenger in a car that had been pulled over for a traffic violation to submit to a pat-down.
Question
Taking steps to protect one's privacy is enough to protect against law enforcement intrusion.
Question
In Rodriguez v. United States , the Supreme Court ruled that the search had been reasonable under the Fourth Amendment's rules regarding searches and seizures.
Question
In California v. Greenwood (1988), the Supreme Court believed that the suspect had a reasonable expectation of privacy when it came to his garbage bags.
Question
What is a Miranda warning? List the situations in which a Miranda warning is not required.
Question
Warrantless searches and seizures can be lawful when police are in "hot pursuit" of a subject.
Question
As a general rule, officers cannot make a warrantless arrest for a crime they did not see even if they have probable cause to believe that a felony has been committed.
Question
According to criminal justice professor Rolando V. del Carmen, what are the four elements that must be present for an arrest to take place?
Question
Thermal imagers cannot measure invisible levels of infrared radiation.
Question
Probable cause can be retroactively applied.
Question
Describe the Reid technique, and explain the three general types of false confessions suggested by Saul Kassin.
Question
Describe the use of force multipliers in electronic surveillance.
Question
One of the implications of the exclusionary rule is that it forces police to gather evidence properly.
Question
Police officers cannot stop and frisk a suspect without a warrant even if reasonable suspicion exists.
Question
The drafters of the Bill of Rights specifically wanted law enforcement officers to have the freedom to make general, exploratory searches through a person's belongings.
Question
Generally, association is adequate to establish probable cause.
Unlock Deck
Sign up to unlock the cards in this deck!
Unlock Deck
Unlock Deck
1/77
auto play flashcards
Play
simple tutorial
Full screen (f)
exit full mode
Deck 6: Police and the Constitution the Rules of Law Enforcement
1
One of the critical legal concepts of the Fourth Amendment is the prohibition against _____.

A) unreasonable searches and seizures
B) establishing probable cause
C) the inevitable discovery exception
D) corporal punishment
A
2
When police are conducting a search or seizure, they:

A) must be reasonable.
B) have absolute discretion.
C) can apply probable cause retroactively.
D) must not carry arms.
A
3
Before going to a judge to ask for a search warrant, law enforcement officers must prepare a(n) _____ in which they provide specific, written information on the property that they wish to search and seize.

A) deposition
B) affidavit
C) injunction
D) apostille
B
4
To acquire a search warrant, a law enforcement officer must:

A) have information showing probable cause that a crime has been or will be committed.
B) first arrest the suspect.
C) gather information that shows the age, intelligence, and physical condition of the suspect.
D) get the consent from the individual who must be searched.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 77 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
5
According to the Fourth Amendment, a search warrant must:

A) be transferable among bordering states if a suspected criminal is out of jurisdiction.
B) be used for searches and seizures within five days of issuing.
C) describe with particularity the place to be searched and the things to be seized.
D) have a clause to apply probable cause retroactively.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 77 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
6
Under the private search doctrine, _____.

A) an officer is allowed to conduct a search based on suspicion
B) an individual can seek privacy only within the confines of his or her dwelling
C) even after a private search has taken place, the owner of the searched items can have a reasonable expectation of privacy
D) law enforcement officers do not need a warrant to go through personal items that have already been searched by a third-party civilian
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 77 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
7
To understand the rules for policing set down in the U.S. Constitution and enforced by the courts, law enforcement officers must understand _____.

A) the Seventeenth Amendment
B) the Eleventh Amendment
C) the Fourth Amendment
D) the First Amendment
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 77 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
8
Which of the following statements is true about the Supreme Court ruling in Rodriguez v. United States ?

A) The Court ruled that the Nebraska police officer had overstepped the boundaries of his authority.
B) The Court held that the judicial determination of probable cause must be made within forty-eight hours after the arrest.
C) The Court ruled that the Nebraska police officer had the right to search Rodriguez's vehicle without a warrant on the grounds of probable cause.
D) The Court held that the Fourth Amendment protects people, not vehicles, houses, papers, and effects.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 77 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
9
Which of the following statements is true of the private search doctrine?

A) A private search eliminates an owner's reasonable expectation of privacy regarding the object searched.
B) An individual loses the right to privacy once he or she has committed a heinous crime.
C) An individual may seek privacy only within the confines of his or her dwelling.
D) A private search does not eliminate the need to establish a probable cause to secure a search warrant.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 77 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
10
In the context of the rules of law enforcement, a(n) _____ is the act of taking possession of a person or property by the government because of a (suspected) violation of the law.

A) deposition
B) seizure
C) injunction
D) frisk
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 77 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
11
Which of the following is a component of the two-pronged test set by Justice John Harlan, Jr., for a person's expectation of privacy?

A) An individual must prove that he or she expected privacy.
B) Society's recognition of expectation of privacy as reasonable or unreasonable is irrelevant.
C) An individual may not seek privacy in a public place.
D) A person can expect privacy even if evidence is in plain view.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 77 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
12
Which of the following statements is true of the burden of probable cause?

A) It cannot be established on the basis of information from an informant.
B) It requires more than mere suspicion on a police officer's part.
C) It prohibits the use of an affidavit before seeking a search warrant.
D) It requires police officers to obtain a warrant for consent searches.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 77 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
13
Among the sources that can establish probable cause, _____ is generally inadequate.

A) evidence in plain view
B) information
C) association
D) personal observation
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 77 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
14
Seth, a law enforcement officer, suspected a person to be guilty of burglary. He found an eyewitness who saw the suspect leaving the burgled property. The declaration by the witness was enough to establish probable cause for a search warrant. In the given scenario, which of the following sources of probable cause did Seth use?

A) Information
B) Personal observation
C) Evidence
D) Association
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 77 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
15
Brian, a police officer, acquired a search warrant for a man named Jacob. During the search, Brian found drugs in Jacob's house. However, Brian later found out that the warrant was for another man with the same name. A computer error had caused the mix-up, and at the time of the search, Brian was unaware of the error. The Court allowed the drug to be used as evidence although the warrant was technically invalid. The given scenario best exemplifies the _____.

A) "inevitable discovery" exception
B) exclusionary rule
C) plain view doctrine
D) "good faith" exception
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 77 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
16
Which of the following is a critical legal concept pertaining to the Fourth Amendment?

A) The inevitable discovery exception
B) The requirement of a warrant for consent searches
C) The good faith exception
D) The requirement of probable cause to issue a warrant
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 77 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
17
Historically, the courts have looked to the _____ for guidance in regulating the activity of law enforcement officers.

A) First Amendment
B) Fourth Amendment
C) Eleventh Amendment
D) Eighteenth Amendment
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 77 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
18
In the context of the rules of law enforcement, a search is:

A) a governmental intrusion on a citizen's reasonable expectation of privacy.
B) the act of taking possession of a person or property by the government because of a violation of the law.
C) a brief detention of a person by law enforcement agents for questioning.
D) the act of apprehending a suspect for the purpose of detaining him or her on a criminal charge.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 77 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
19
The recognized standard for a "reasonable expectation of privacy" was established in:

A) United States v. Robinson (1973).
B) Chimel v. California (1969).
C) Katz v. United States (1967).
D) Carroll v. United States (1925).
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 77 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
20
Simon is a homicide detective. While working on a case, he seized a knife from the defendant's house during an unwarranted search. His suspicion that the knife was the murder weapon was proved right by the lab results. However, because Simon failed to establish probable cause before conducting the search, the court did not allow the knife to be submitted as evidence. In the given scenario, the court most likely exercised the _____.

A) inevitable discovery exception
B) exclusionary rule
C) good faith exception
D) plain view doctrine
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 77 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
21
Justin, a cop, stopped a car that was speeding on the freeway. When he approached the car, he saw a couple of vials of marijuana kept on the passenger seat. Justin asked the driver to step out of the vehicle and seized the vials from the car. In the given scenario, Justin did not possess a warrant, but his act of seizing the vials is justified under the _____.

A) automobile exception
B) exclusionary rule
C) good faith exception
D) plain view doctrine
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 77 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
22
The precedent for the ever-elusive definition of a "reasonable" suspicion in stop-and-frisk situations was established in _____.

A) Davis v. United States (1994)
B) Maryland v. Wilson (1997)
C) Miranda v. Arizona (1966)
D) Terry v. Ohio (1968)
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 77 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
23
For a warrant for electronic surveillance to be valid, it:

A) does not need to show probable cause.
B) must name the technicians who will monitor the surveillance.
C) must detail with particularity the conversations that are to be overheard.
D) does not need to name the suspects as long as it names the places that will be under surveillance.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 77 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
24
_____ is a necessary part of an arrest that is considered to have occurred when an individual submits to the control of an officer either peacefully or under the threat or use of force.

A) Acquittal
B) Incrimination
C) Entrapment
D) Detention
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 77 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
25
The Constitution, as interpreted by American courts, provides very little protection to evidence _____.

A) possessed by a witness
B) that is clear and convincing
C) in plain view
D) obtained illegally
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 77 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
26
According to criminal justice professor Rolando V. del Carmen of Sam Houston State University, which of the following elements must be present for an arrest to take place?

A) The intent to arrest
B) The previous arrest record of the arrestee
C) The physical evidence pertinent to the crime
D) The consent of the arrestee
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 77 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
27
Which of the following is established by the Fourth Amendment with regard to searches of automobiles?

A) Officers must obtain the consent of the driver before searching his or her automobile even if they have obtained a warrant for the search.
B) Officers do not require a warrant to search an automobile if they have probable cause to believe that it contains contraband.
C) Individuals caught for speeding will have to submit their vehicles for inspection without a warrant.
D) Individuals in a vehicle have the same reasonable expectation of privacy as someone at home.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 77 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
28
According to justices hearing the case of the discovery of 128 pounds of marijuana in a minivan in Arizona in 2002, which of the following police duties is part of the totality of the circumstances?

A) The need to electronically monitor specific dwellings
B) The need to exclude the elderly from routine stops
C) The need to prevent terrorist attacks
D) The need to give privacy to individuals at work
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 77 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
29
In which of the following cases was the plain view doctrine first put forward by the Supreme Court?

A) Burger v. New York (1967)
B) Terry v. Ohio (1968)
C) Coolidge v. New Hampshire (1971)
D) Wilson v. Arkansas (1995)
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 77 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
30
In general, law enforcement officers can use electronic surveillance only:

A) if the concerned parties refuse to agree for a consent search.
B) if the parties to be monitored are suspected of drug dealing.
C) if the judge refused to issue warrant on the basis of officers' suspicion.
D) if consent is given by one of the parties to be monitored.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 77 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
31
In which of the following cases can a police officer frisk an individual?

A) When the officer feels that frisking may reveal incriminating evidence
B) When the officer stops an individual at a public place
C) When the officer suspects that the individual is carrying drugs
D) When the officer is justified in thinking that the safety of police officers may be jeopardized
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 77 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
32
In the context of searches with consent, which of the following is one of the most relevant factors in determining whether consent is voluntary?

A) The officers' belief that the location to be searched contains evidence
B) The length of the questioning and its location
C) The particularity of the conversations that are overheard
D) The type of offense committed in the presence of an officer
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 77 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
33
Benjamin, a law enforcement officer, stops a car he suspects may have been involved in a hit-and-run case. The man driving the car pleads the Fifth Amendment. Which of the following does Benjamin have the right to do until further investigation?

A) Ask the driver to identify himself
B) Keep the driver in protective custody until a warrant can be obtained
C) Frisk the driver on grounds of suspicion
D) Arrest the driver for interrogation
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 77 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
34
Devices that allow law enforcement agencies to expand their capabilities without a significant increase in personnel are known as _____.

A) task forces
B) force multipliers
C) rapid action forces
D) enforcers
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 77 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
35
According to the ruling in California v. Riley (2014), the police:

A) can search cell phones as they are covered by the plain view doctrine.
B) do not need to establish probable cause before engaging in cell phone searches.
C) need a warrant before engaging in cell phone searches.
D) do not need the consent of a cell phone owner to conduct cell phone searches.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 77 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
36
In which of the following situations does the Fourth Amendment protect privacy?

A) When an officer uses a thermal imager to view items in a dwelling
B) When an individual is at a railway station with his luggage
C) When an individual discards certain goods by leaving it in a public place
D) When an officer finds incriminating evidence during a consent search
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 77 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
37
In the context of searches incidental to arrests, which of the following is a police officer authorized to search without a warrant or additional probable cause?

A) A passenger traveling with a person who is a suspect
B) A group of individuals working at a suspect's workplace in his or her absence
C) A suspect's vehicle that is parked inside another person's house
D) An area within a suspect's immediate control
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 77 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
38
Which of the following is an important circumstance in which a warrant is not needed?

A) When the police conduct consent searches
B) When the police have a suspicion
C) When the police conduct seizures
D) When the police search a suspect in a public place
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 77 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
39
In the years since the Terry v. Ohio (1968) case was decided, the Court has settled on _____ to determine whether a stop is based on reasonable suspicion.

A) a totality of the circumstances test
B) the inevitable discovery exception
C) the exclusionary rule
D) a "good faith" exception
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 77 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
40
Which of the following is a difference between a stop and an arrest?

A) A stop requires probable cause, whereas an arrest can be justified by reasonable suspicion.
B) An arrest is the act of apprehending a suspect for the purpose of detaining him or her, whereas a stop is a relatively brief intrusion on a citizen's rights.
C) A stop requires a warrant, whereas an arrest can be made without a warrant.
D) An officer intends to investigate suspicious activity during an arrest, whereas he or she intends to make a formal charge during a stop.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 77 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
41
_____ are situations in which law enforcement officers need not announce themselves before entering a dwelling, such as when they have a reasonable belief that a felony is being committed at the time of entering.

A) Exigent circumstances
B) Emergent circumstances
C) Total circumstances
D) Inevitable circumstances
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 77 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
42
Which of the following aspects of a criminal investigation is strongly affected by the Miranda warning?

A) The seizure
B) The interrogation
C) The confiscation of evidence
D) The search
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 77 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
43
In _____, the Court upheld the conviction of a suspect who claimed that he had invoked his Miranda rights by being mostly silent during questioning.

A) Berghuis v. Thompkins (2010)
B) Florida v. Jardines (2013)
C) Riverside v. McLaughlin (1991)
D) Brewer v. Williams (1977)
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 77 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
44
In the context of interrogation, an admission refers to a:

A) statement in which the subject admits to committing the crime.
B) statement verifying information about some aspect of the underlying crime.
C) person's understanding that an arrest has taken place.
D) false confession by a person.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 77 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
45
Jason, a detective, obtained an arrest warrant for Warren. Jason went to Warren's house to take him into custody. Jason knocked at the door and announced his arrival several times. He then heard gun shots inside the house, and he broke in. In the given scenario, Jason's breaking in was admissible under _____.

A) the exclusionary rule
B) the inevitable discovery exception
C) exigent circumstances
D) mitigating circumstances
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 77 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
46
Michelle, a homicide detective, is working on a murder case. She finds some information in the case file that leads her to suspect Derek, the victim's boyfriend. However, when she brings him in for interrogation, he refuses to answer any questions in the absence of his lawyer. In the given scenario, Derek is most likely exercising his _____.

A) Miranda rights
B) right to privacy
C) Garrity Rights
D) right to petition
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 77 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
47
Which of the following statements is true about the Miranda warning?

A) It is not required during a stop and frisk, when no arrest has been made.
B) It is not required before a custodial interrogation takes place.
C) It is required when a person volunteers information before the police have asked a question.
D) It is required when the police are questioning witnesses at the scene of a crime.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 77 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
48
In which of the following cases can a law enforcement officer make a warrantless arrest?

A) When the suspect refuses to submit to a frisk during a routine traffic stop
B) When the officer suspects that the suspect is going to commit a crime in the near future
C) When the arrest warrant has been denied by a judge
D) When the offense is committed in the presence of the officer
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 77 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
49
Which of the following is the recommended waiting period for police officers to enter a dwelling after knocking and announcing?

A) Three to five seconds
B) Fifteen to twenty seconds
C) At least three minutes
D) At least five minutes
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 77 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
50
Which of the following has been offered as a means to promote police accountability?

A) The mandatory videotaping of interrogations
B) The mandatory wait period after knocking and announcing
C) The use of force multipliers
D) The good faith exception
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 77 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
51
Who among the following has the authority to issue an arrest warrant?

A) Magistrates
B) Division chiefs
C) Commanders
D) Sheriffs
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 77 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
52
In Hudson v. Michigan (2006), Detroit police did not knock before entering the defendant's home with a warrant. Instead, they announced themselves and waited for only three to five seconds before making their entrance. In this case, the Court stated that:

A) the search was inadmissible because the officers were not in hot pursuit.
B) improper knock and announce is not enough to disqualify evidence uncovered on the basis of a valid search warrant.
C) improper knock and announce is unreasonable enough to provide defendants with immunity under the Fourth Amendment.
D) because of exigent circumstances, the police officers did not need to announce themselves.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 77 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
53
According to law professor H. Richard Uviller, which of the following provides the basis for the Miranda rights?

A) Inherent coercion
B) Defamation
C) Exigent circumstances
D) Propaganda
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 77 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
54
Which of the following was ruled by the Supreme Court as a result of the Miranda case?

A) A Miranda warning is not required if the police ask the suspect questions that are testimonial in nature.
B) Suspects can be seated in interrogation rooms for a few hours before questioning.
C) Every suspect needs protection from coercion.
D) Confessions are invalid if the suspect is aware of the Miranda warning.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 77 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
55
Brent, a police officer, has taken a suspect for interrogation after giving him the Miranda warning. The suspect invokes his Miranda rights and refuses to answer any questions. In the given scenario, Brent should:

A) release the suspect from custody until an attorney arrives.
B) immediately stop questioning the suspect.
C) use psychological duress to obtain a confession.
D) force him to confess.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 77 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
56
Which of the following statements best describes compliant false confessions?

A) A suspect is seeking attention or is delusional and thinks he or she did commit the crime.
B) A suspect is vaguely associated with a crime and gives false testimony against someone else.
C) A suspect is a vulnerable person-suffering from the stress of the interrogation-who comes to believe that he or she committed the crime.
D) A suspect knows he or she is innocent but decides-under police influence-that it is in his or her best interests to confess to the crime.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 77 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
57
Generally, Miranda requirements apply only when:

A) a suspect is forcefully detained or perceives that he or she is not free to leave the immediate vicinity.
B) the police have not focused on a suspect and are questioning witnesses at the scene of a crime.
C) a person volunteers information before the police have asked a question.
D) a person has been stopped and frisked without being arrested.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 77 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
58
Which of the following statements is true of an arrest warrant?

A) It does not give law enforcement officers the authority to enter a dwelling without first announcing themselves.
B) It does not require probable cause and can be issued based on the existing criminal record of a suspect.
C) It does not need to be specific about how many people will be arrested.
D) It does not specify the crime a person is suspected of having committed.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 77 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
59
Which of the following statements best describes internalized false confessions?

A) A suspect is seeking attention or is delusional and thinks he or she did commit the crime.
B) A suspect is vaguely associated with a crime and decides to take complete responsibility.
C) A suspect is a vulnerable person who comes to believe that he or she committed the crime.
D) A suspect knows he or she is innocent but decides that it is in his or her best interests to confess to the crime.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 77 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
60
For _____, the crime must have been committed in the presence of an officer for a warrantless arrest to be valid.

A) misdemeanors
B) arson
C) felonies
D) larceny
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 77 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
61
Explain the exclusionary rule and the fruit of the poisoned tree. How do they impact police officers' investigations?
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 77 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
62
In 2009, the Court extended the "stop-and-frisk" authority by ruling that a police officer could order a passenger in a car that had been pulled over for a traffic violation to submit to a pat-down.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 77 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
63
Taking steps to protect one's privacy is enough to protect against law enforcement intrusion.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 77 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
64
In Rodriguez v. United States , the Supreme Court ruled that the search had been reasonable under the Fourth Amendment's rules regarding searches and seizures.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 77 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
65
In California v. Greenwood (1988), the Supreme Court believed that the suspect had a reasonable expectation of privacy when it came to his garbage bags.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 77 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
66
What is a Miranda warning? List the situations in which a Miranda warning is not required.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 77 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
67
Warrantless searches and seizures can be lawful when police are in "hot pursuit" of a subject.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 77 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
68
As a general rule, officers cannot make a warrantless arrest for a crime they did not see even if they have probable cause to believe that a felony has been committed.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 77 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
69
According to criminal justice professor Rolando V. del Carmen, what are the four elements that must be present for an arrest to take place?
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 77 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
70
Thermal imagers cannot measure invisible levels of infrared radiation.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 77 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
71
Probable cause can be retroactively applied.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 77 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
72
Describe the Reid technique, and explain the three general types of false confessions suggested by Saul Kassin.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 77 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
73
Describe the use of force multipliers in electronic surveillance.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 77 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
74
One of the implications of the exclusionary rule is that it forces police to gather evidence properly.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 77 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
75
Police officers cannot stop and frisk a suspect without a warrant even if reasonable suspicion exists.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 77 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
76
The drafters of the Bill of Rights specifically wanted law enforcement officers to have the freedom to make general, exploratory searches through a person's belongings.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 77 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
77
Generally, association is adequate to establish probable cause.
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 77 flashcards in this deck.
Unlock Deck
k this deck
locked card icon
Unlock Deck
Unlock for access to all 77 flashcards in this deck.