Exam 11: Confessions and Admissions: Miranda V Arizona
Exam 1: The Court System and Sources of Rights120 Questions
Exam 2: Overview of the Criminal Justice Process120 Questions
Exam 3: Probable Cause and Reasonable Suspicion120 Questions
Exam 4: The Exclusionary Rule120 Questions
Exam 5: Stop and Frisk, Border Seizures, and Stationhouse Detentions119 Questions
Exam 6: Arrests117 Questions
Exam 7: Searches and Seizures of Things120 Questions
Exam 8: Vehicle Stops, Searches, and Inventories120 Questions
Exam 9: Plain View, Open Fields, Abandonment, and Electronic Surveillance120 Questions
Exam 10: Lineups and Other Pretrial Identification Procedures120 Questions
Exam 11: Confessions and Admissions: Miranda V Arizona120 Questions
Exam 12: Constitutional Rights of the Accused During Trial120 Questions
Exam 13: Civil Lawsuits Against the Police120 Questions
Exam 14: Legal Liabilities of Law Enforcement Officers120 Questions
Exam 15: Electronic Surveillance and the War on Terror119 Questions
Select questions type
The burden of proof in questions of Miranda waivers is on the defense.
Free
(True/False)
4.9/5
(34)
Correct Answer:
False
If a suspect is not under arrest,but is deprived of freedom in a significant way,he is in custody.
Free
(True/False)
4.9/5
(34)
Correct Answer:
True
The ________exception occurs when questions asked by police officers are reasonably prompted by concern for safety of the public.
Free
(Short Answer)
4.8/5
(37)
Correct Answer:
public safety
Before Miranda,the sole test for the admissibility of a confession was
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(34)
When asking a suspect routine identification questions,Miranda________ apply.
(Short Answer)
4.8/5
(38)
A(n)________is an intentional giving up of a known right or remedy.
(Short Answer)
4.8/5
(34)
Under the test before the Miranda decision,the question to be answered to determine admissibility of the statements given by Zona and Xavier was whether the statement was
(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(33)
Which of the following warnings to suspects is not required by the Miranda decision?
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(41)
In U.S.v.Dickerson (1999),the U.S.Court of Appeals held that the requirement of Miranda warnings was overruled by a federal statute because Miranda was
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(28)
The Miranda warning is not required when confessions are made to private citizens acting on their own,because
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(39)
A person subjected to a routine temporary traffic stop is not entitled to Miranda warnings before questions are asked.
(True/False)
4.9/5
(40)
As a result of the U.S.Supreme Court decision in Dickerson,only a constitutional ________can do away at present with the Miranda warnings.
(Short Answer)
4.8/5
(32)
Before Miranda,the courts decided on the admissibility of confessions and admissions on a case-by-case basis,based on
(Multiple Choice)
5.0/5
(40)
The warning that a suspect may terminate an interview at any time is a required part of the Miranda warnings.
(True/False)
4.8/5
(33)
After Miranda warnings have been given,the individual may knowingly and intelligently waive these rights.
(True/False)
4.8/5
(41)
An error made by a trial court in admitting evidence does not require reversal of the conviction by an appellate court if the appellate court decides that the error was________ .
(Short Answer)
4.9/5
(31)
Miranda does not apply to persons suspected of committing only misdemeanors,even if they are in custody and are being interrogated.
(True/False)
4.8/5
(31)
Although often associated with a suspect's right to counsel,Miranda v.Arizona is in fact based on the
(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(28)
Specify three types of situations where statements obtained in violation of Miranda,or evidence obtained from such__________a statement,can still be utilized as evidence.Do you agree or disagree that such exceptions to Miranda should be allowed? Explain your position.
(Essay)
5.0/5
(31)
Showing 1 - 20 of 120
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)