Exam 13: Genuineness of Assent and Undue Influence
Exam 1: Legal Heritage and the Information Age71 Questions
Exam 2: Court Systems and Jurisdiction52 Questions
Exam 3: Judicial, Alternative, and Online Dispute Resolution82 Questions
Exam 4: Constitutional Law for Business and E-Commerce71 Questions
Exam 5: Intentional Torts and Negligence65 Questions
Exam 6: Strict Liability and Product Liability81 Questions
Exam 7: Intellectual Property and Cyber Piracy76 Questions
Exam 8: Criminal Law and Cyber Crimes86 Questions
Exam 9: Nature of Traditional and E-Contracts74 Questions
Exam 10: Agreement85 Questions
Exam 11: Consideration and Promissory Estoppel67 Questions
Exam 12: Capacity and Legality90 Questions
Exam 13: Genuineness of Assent and Undue Influence79 Questions
Exam 14: Statute of Frauds and Equitable Exceptions87 Questions
Exam 15: Third-Party Rights and Discharge100 Questions
Exam 16: Remedies for Breach of Traditional and E-Contracts82 Questions
Exam 17: Internet Law and E-Commerce52 Questions
Exam 18: Formation of Sales and Lease Contracts84 Questions
Exam 19: Title to Goods and Risk of Loss88 Questions
Exam 20: Remedies for Breach of Sales and Lease Contracts91 Questions
Exam 21: Sales and Lease Warranties73 Questions
Exam 22: Creation of Negotiable Instruments55 Questions
Exam 23: Transferability and Holder In Due Course56 Questions
Exam 24: Liability,Defenses and Discharge78 Questions
Exam 25: Checks, the Banking System, and E-Money83 Questions
Exam 26: Creditor's and Debtor's Rights54 Questions
Exam 27: Secured Transactions and Electronic Filing98 Questions
Exam 28: Bankruptcy and Reorganization94 Questions
Exam 29: Agency Formation and Termination86 Questions
Exam 30: Liability of Principals, Agents, and Independent Contractors72 Questions
Exam 31: Employment,Worker Protection,and Immigration Laws69 Questions
Exam 32: Labor Law and Collective Bargaining81 Questions
Exam 33: Equal Opportunity in Employment87 Questions
Exam 34: Small Businesses, Entrepreneurs, and General Partnerships57 Questions
Exam 35: Limited Partnerships and Limited Liability Limited Partnerships67 Questions
Exam 36: Corporate Formation and Financing103 Questions
Exam 37: Corporate Governance and the Sarbanes Oxley Act101 Questions
Exam 38: Corporate Acquisitions and Multinational Corporations78 Questions
Exam 39: Limited Liability Companies and Limited Liability Partnerships84 Questions
Exam 40: Franchises and Special Forms of Business50 Questions
Exam 41: Investor Protection and Online Securities Transactions84 Questions
Exam 42: Ethics and Social Responsibility of Business70 Questions
Exam 43: Administrative Law and Regulatory Agencies50 Questions
Exam 44: Consumer Protection and Product Safety53 Questions
Exam 45: Environmental Protection and Global Warming72 Questions
Exam 46: Antitrust Law and Unfair Trade Practices107 Questions
Exam 47: Personal Property and Bailment104 Questions
Exam 48: Real Property105 Questions
Exam 49: Landlord Tenant Law and Land Use Regulation83 Questions
Exam 50: Insurance73 Questions
Exam 51: Accountants' Liability93 Questions
Exam 52: Wills, Trusts, and Elder Law98 Questions
Exam 53: Family Law65 Questions
Exam 54: International and World Trade Law49 Questions
Select questions type
The threat to bring a criminal charge (lawsuit)or civil lawsuit is duress.
Free
(True/False)
4.9/5
(36)
Correct Answer:
False
Where two parties contract for the purchase and sale of an ordinary item,such as a desk,that unknown to both parties is a rare and valuable example of that item,this is:
Free
(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(34)
Correct Answer:
D
Under which of the following circumstances can the mistaken party rescind a contract when there is a unilateral mistake?
Free
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(38)
Correct Answer:
C
A contract between two parties in a fiduciary relationship,which unduly benefits the dominant party,is presumed to have been made under undue influence.
(True/False)
4.8/5
(36)
A fraudulent misrepresentation may be used to show that genuine assent was lacking in a parties' contract.
(True/False)
4.8/5
(40)
Generally,a mutual mistake does not allow either party to rescind the contract.
(True/False)
4.8/5
(36)
Billy is out in the bars one hot August afternoon and runs into Carl Coach,who coaches the football team where he went to college.Billy invites Carl to join him for drinks,and they have the following conversation:
Billy: I need to talk to you about the upcoming football season.I need you to make sure that the football team wins each game by as much as possible.For each game that the team wins by at least 25 points,I'll give you $1,000.
Carl: I don't know if I can promise that.I don't know if any coach could.
Billy: Well,I'll even give you an extra $500 if it's by more than 35 points.
Carl: That sounds good.I can do that with this team.
Billy: Great! Here's to a good season!
And,they toast pitchers of beer.The team is undefeated that year,winning all but two games by more than 25 points and 3 of them by more than 35 points.The other two games were each won by 20 points.At season's end,Billy has paid nothing to Carl.Carl sues Billy for payment.Billy sues Carl to recover loses caused because of bets he placed in the two games won by only 20 points.Discuss the arguments that each has with respect to this agreement and the likely outcome.
(Essay)
4.8/5
(37)
If someone buys a piece of artwork which neither the buyer nor seller knows is a masterpiece,this is considered a mutual mistake of value.Can the seller rescind such a contract? If,however,a buyer and seller think the piece of artwork being sold is a particular masterpiece,but in fact it is not,this is considered a mutual mistake of fact.Can the buyer in this case rescind the contract? Why is the result different in these two situations? What is different about the two situations that would suggest that they have different outcomes?
(Essay)
4.9/5
(32)
Why is there a requirement to prove reliance in order to recover for fraud? Why should the law not penalize a person who knowingly makes a false statement,regardless of whether the person to whom the statement is made can prove reliance? Would there be any practical problems if the reliance requirement were eliminated?
(Essay)
4.9/5
(39)
Which of the following statements is true regarding duress?
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(32)
Gerald was a subcontractor,bidding on a contract for XYZ Corp.,the general contractor.When adding up the total of materials and labor,Gerald's secretary made a clerical error with a total of $45,000 instead of $450,000.Gerald then submitted his bid for $45,000.XYZ accepted Gerald's bid of $45,000,mostly because all the other bids were over $400,000.When Gerald learns of his mistake,he tells XYZ that he cannot perform the contract.If XYZ sues to enforce this contract,what is the most likely result?
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(31)
You buy a pair of very used skis for $25 from a store in Steamboat Springs.You learn later that Billy Kidd,a famous skier,owned the skis years ago.The store demands that you return them because it did not know that they once belonged to Billy Kidd.Which is true?
(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(38)
In undue influence,the persuasion by the dominant party must have overcome the free will of the innocent party.
(True/False)
4.7/5
(39)
In a situation where one party to a contract has lied about the subject matter in order to entice the other party to enter into a contract,the type of fraud that would most likely be present is:
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(27)
Kevin disconnects the odometer on his car and then drives it for another 15,000 miles after which he decides to sell it.When Linda inquires about the vehicle,Kevin says "the odometer indicates the car has only 20,000 miles on it." Kevin's statement is:
(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(30)
Bill sells some old books to Marion for a small sum of money.A few weeks later,Marion discovers that the books are quite valuable,worth as much as $50,000.Bill seeks to rescind the contract.What is the most likely result?
(Multiple Choice)
5.0/5
(33)
Jennifer was shopping at Good Deal Auto Sales.The salesperson showed her one particular car that caught her fancy.The salesperson said that the car was a 1999 model,only had 25,000 miles,had been overhauled one year ago,and was the best buy for the money anywhere in town.Jennifer knew the car was a 1998 model,but otherwise she believed the salesperson.She bought the car.Later it is discovered that the car had 125,000 miles,had been overhauled 14 months ago,and that a better buy existed at another dealer.Each of these things makes the car worth much less than Jennifer paid for it.The salesperson and the dealership knew all these things.Jennifer sues for fraud.Which of the following best describes this situation?
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(34)
Showing 1 - 20 of 79
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)