Exam 5: Competitive Rivalry and Competitive Dynamics

In general, small firms are more likely than large firms to launch competitive actions and tend to do it more quickly.

Case Scenario 2: Plasco. Plasco is a $3 billion U.S.-based manufacturer of flexible plastic products like trash cans, reheatable and freezable food containers, and a broad range of other plastic storage containers designed for home and office use. Historically, Plasco has been the category killer for most of its products and has devoted tremendous resources to new product development on an ongoing basis - this research intensity has allowed the company to release, on average, a new product every day over the past five years. Despite its past strength and high brand awareness, Plasco's profitability has been eroded by dramatic increases in the cost of plastic resin, the primary input into its plastic products. Moreover, the retail channel has experienced rapid consolidation resulting in a shift in the balance of power from branded manufacturers like Plasco, to strong retailers like Wal-Mart, who in turn have been unwilling to help Plasco absorb the higher resin costs. Enhancing Wal-Mart's power is the fact that it can always turn to alternative high-volume sources of consumer plastic products like Sterlite. Further hampering Plasco's recovery is the emergence of feisty little foreign competitors like Zig Industries, a $250 million Israeli firm that has begun to take part of Plasco's market share in plastic toolboxes. Ironically, Plasco was the first company to offer plastic toolboxes some 20 years ago. This innovation changed the market dramatically and Plasco's first mover strategy rewarded it with a rapidly growing new segment and a dominant market position. Today, Plasco's toolboxes are viewed as rather boring, while Zig's products are ingeniously designed to catch the customer's eye in the aisle (better merchandising the product) and capture their interest (and pocketbook) with many new and novel features. Zig is also able to provide this new line of toolboxes at between 10% to 15% less than Plasco. -(Refer to Case Scenario 2) How can a small player like Zig be such a successful competitor against a large, established firm like Plasco?

Case Scenario 1: Romulac, Inc. Romulac Inc. (RI), a subsidiary of a large successful manufacturing conglomerate, supplies a key component in the assembly of residential cooling systems (air conditioning units, etc.). There has been tremendous consolidation in RI's industry, to the point where only five suppliers of this particular component account for nearly 90% of U.S. industry sales. Paralleling this trend, its customers - comprised of makers of branded residential air conditioning units like Carrier and Trane - have seen similar levels of consolidation in their own industry. Half of these firms produce all their components in-house, while the balance purchases them from specialized component manufacturers like RI. RI's business is extremely capital intensive, and their 40% share of the market allows them to also be the most profitable domestic player. Strong competitors exist in Europe and Asia. Although like RI, these foreign players' strongholds are their home regions, with negligible presence outside of the region. Some of the larger Asian manufacturers have signaled an interest in more aggressively pursuing the lucrative U.S. market. RI is presently considering a $400 million dollar investment in a new plant, which will create a component that is much quieter, more efficient, and is likely to satisfy future regulatory standards. While the core technology for the new component is very old, RI's engineering and design skills have allowed them to retain their low cost-advantage, even though the component will represent a significant improvement over products currently provided by its competition. -(Refer to Case Scenario 1) Develop an argument as to why RI should try to be a first-mover with this new technology.

A strategy's success is determined not only by the firm's initial competitive actions but also by how well it anticipates competitors' responses to them and by how well the firm anticipates and responds to its competitors initial actions.

Which of the following is the most strategic action by Wal-Mart?

Research suggests that a firm with greater multimarket contact is less likely to initiate an attack, but more likely to respond aggressively when attacked.

The need for quality products and services is so high that quality alone can assure a firm that it will achieve strategic competitiveness and earn above-average returns.

Toyota's hybrid power train (e.g., the Prius) has been dominant for a number of years but rivals such as Porche, Chrysler, Hyundai and GM have all developed competing hybrid systems. The developments aimed at improving fuel efficiency illustrate competitive rivalry or "actions and responses" by firms in the global automobile industry (Chapter 5 Strategic Focus).

Which pair of firms has the LEAST resource similarity?

Canon's desktop copiers couldn't collate, enlarge, or do grayscale replication and as such failed as a disruptive innovation (Chapter 5 Opening Case).

Case Scenario 3: The Pet Food Industry. The pet food industry is comprised primarily of six market segments: dry dog food, dry cat food, moist dog food, moist cat food, canned dog food, and canned cat food. Five large firms dominate the market and each has some market share in all segments, and the leading share in at least one segment. The largest firm participates solely in the pet food industry, while the next four firms are actually subsidiaries of some of the world's largest food and consumer products companies. Top management of these larger firms have made public statements that suggest they each see themselves as future leaders of the pet food industry. All five have acquired comparable skills in terms of manufacturing and marketing. Two small firms also participate in the industry, but these players are relatively weak and compete in just two of the six segments; the pet food industry is the only industry in which they operate. Inputs to the industry are basic commodities and there is no real threat of substitute products except across segments and price points. The industry is growing slowly, barely keeping up with the rate of inflation. Barriers to entry are enormous when pet food companies can gain scale economies in production coupled with aggressive marketing, though even then these coordinated actions may only yield average industry profitability. Any firm can increase its market share only to the extent that another firm's share is decreased. -(Refer to Case Scenario 3) The pet food industry is best characterized as an example of

Competitive rivalry has the most effect on the firm's ____ strategies than the firm's other strategies.

Firms that are typically late movers usually have little organizational slack.

Wal-Mart initially used a focused cost leadership strategy to compete only in small communities by using sophisticated logistics systems and efficient purchasing practices to gain a competitive advantage. The response of local competitors was _______ because they __________.

Bayou Belle Water markets water drawn only from a single artesian well in Southern Louisiana. It has a loyal following in its region. Since Bayou Belle markets the water, just as Coca-Cola, Nestle, and PepsiCo do, Bayou Belle has high resource similarity with these international firms.

The CEO of the Wholesome Food retail grocery chain, which specializes in organic and natural produce and meat, has stated, "The key to success is to find your niche and focus on it, regardless of what anyone else does." The CEO

Quality is a universal theme and is a necessary, but not a sufficient, condition for competitive success.

"Competitive dynamics" indicates that firms and their strategic actions are independent.

A firm can predict that a competitor whose products suffer from poor quality is likely to be less aggressive in its competitive actions until those quality problems are corrected.

Case Scenario 3: The Pet Food Industry. The pet food industry is comprised primarily of six market segments: dry dog food, dry cat food, moist dog food, moist cat food, canned dog food, and canned cat food. Five large firms dominate the market and each has some market share in all segments, and the leading share in at least one segment. The largest firm participates solely in the pet food industry, while the next four firms are actually subsidiaries of some of the world's largest food and consumer products companies. Top management of these larger firms have made public statements that suggest they each see themselves as future leaders of the pet food industry. All five have acquired comparable skills in terms of manufacturing and marketing. Two small firms also participate in the industry, but these players are relatively weak and compete in just two of the six segments; the pet food industry is the only industry in which they operate. Inputs to the industry are basic commodities and there is no real threat of substitute products except across segments and price points. The industry is growing slowly, barely keeping up with the rate of inflation. Barriers to entry are enormous when pet food companies can gain scale economies in production coupled with aggressive marketing, though even then these coordinated actions may only yield average industry profitability. Any firm can increase its market share only to the extent that another firm's share is decreased. -(Refer to Case Scenario 3) The pet food industry provides an example of