Exam 12: Duty and Principle Hypothetical and Categorical Imperatives
Which of the following is an example of a maxim?
D
Compare and contrast Kant's two types of imperatives.
Kant's two types of imperatives are the hypothetical imperative and the categorical imperative.
The hypothetical imperative is based on the idea of "if-then" reasoning, where the action is contingent on a specific goal or desire. For example, "If you want to be healthy, then you should exercise regularly." This type of imperative is conditional and depends on the individual's personal goals and desires.
On the other hand, the categorical imperative is based on the concept of duty and moral obligation, regardless of personal desires or goals. According to Kant, the categorical imperative is derived from reason and applies universally to all rational beings. It is expressed in the form of a command that one must follow unconditionally, such as "Act only according to that maxim whereby you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law."
In contrast, the hypothetical imperative is based on conditional reasoning and personal desires, while the categorical imperative is based on unconditional moral duty and applies universally. Both types of imperatives play a role in Kant's ethical framework, but the categorical imperative holds a higher moral significance as it is based on reason and the concept of duty.
Of Kant's two types of people who help others, the second type helps:
A
Kant's theory that every adult was a rational autonomous agent who should make all ethical decisions themselves without external guidance was inconsistent with the prevailing view during his lifetime.
One should never lie because if lying became a all relations based on trust and honoring promises would become unworkable.
The categorical imperative that causes the most conflicting duties or ethical dilemmas is the rule against _________.
Kant used the term _______ to refer to a rule or general plan of action.
Kant's emphasis on absolute moral rules does not provide a means of:
Because lies can sometimes result in greater good than harm, Kant had no categorical imperative against lying.
Kantian theory is consistent with the ideas of due process, fair trials and rights for the accused.
In Kant's version of , there are some actions we must perform.
What is a personal or subjective plan of action, incorporating the agent's reasons for acting as well as a sufficient indication of what act the reasons call for?
Kant argues that the categorical imperative binds rational agents because they are:
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)