Exam 17: Writing, Electronic Forms, and Interpretation of Contracts

arrow
  • Select Tags
search iconSearch Question
flashcardsStudy Flashcards
  • Select Tags

The parol evidence rule:

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(41)

The writing required by the statute of frauds in the case of a contract for the sale of land must:

(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(42)

As a rule of contractual construction and interpretation, ordinary words are to be interpreted according to their ordinary meaning; accordingly, an unambiguous contract will be interpreted as it is written, not on the basis of the secret intent of one party.

(True/False)
5.0/5
(41)

A promise to pay a debt must be in writing if:

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(41)

A father's oral promise to his daughter and her fiancée made in consideration of their contemplated marriage is binding when made in the course of a serious discussion.

(True/False)
4.8/5
(35)

Provisions of a contract will be considered separately and not as a whole.

(True/False)
4.9/5
(35)

Bart was a self-made millionaire who had earned his fortune by dedicated hard work. Bart had worked so hard that he never had developed much of a social life. Bart met Linda and fell in love with her. When Bart proposed to Linda, she told him that she needed time before making such an important decision. Pressing her for a favorable response, Bart telephoned Linda and promised her $100,000 if she would marry him. Linda then accepted the proposal. Bart contracted with Quick Builders for the construction of a home Bart intended to move into with Linda after their marriage. Construction by Quick was not very quick because Quick was not paying subcontractors the sums that they were owed. They, in turn, were not completing their work. To expedite matters, Bart called the subcontractors and assured them that Bart would pay any sums that Quick Builders did not pay if they would complete the construction. Bart and Linda married and the subcontractors completed the work. Quick Builders did not pay the subcontractors in full. Bart failed to pay Linda the $100,000. Both Linda and the subcontractors sued Bart. Discuss the probable outcome of the lawsuits.

(Essay)
4.9/5
(36)

In the absence of a statute requiring a writing, a contract may be oral or written.

(True/False)
4.8/5
(29)

An oral understanding is not binding if:

(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(40)

When a contract may be terminated at will by either party, the statute of frauds is not applicable because the contract may be terminated within one year.

(True/False)
4.9/5
(31)

When the main purpose of the promisor's promise to pay the debt of another is to benefit the promisor, the statute of frauds is not applicable, and the oral promise to pay the debt is binding.

(True/False)
4.8/5
(32)

The statute of frauds applies to:

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(38)

When an insurance policy is ambiguous, the policy is interpreted:

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(41)

The standard statute of frauds:

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(37)

When the statute of frauds applies and there is no written proof of the contract, the contract is:

(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(46)

An oral contract containing a promise by an executor to pay estate debts from estate funds is:

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(40)

The parol evidence rule does not apply to changes made after the signing of the contract.

(True/False)
4.8/5
(34)

Under the statute of frauds, an oral contract must be completed within one year after performance begins.

(True/False)
4.8/5
(42)

When a person has performed services under an oral contract that cannot be enforced because of the statute of frauds, such person:

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(43)
Showing 41 - 59 of 59
close modal

Filters

  • Essay(0)
  • Multiple Choice(0)
  • Short Answer(0)
  • True False(0)
  • Matching(0)