Exam 17: Writing, Electronic Forms, and Interpretation of Contracts

arrow
  • Select Tags
search iconSearch Question
flashcardsStudy Flashcards
  • Select Tags

A court may not imply a term:

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(33)

Suzy Bartles enters into an oral contract to purchase a tract of land from Bill Hermes. The land is considered worthless, but Bartles feels that she has discovered a possible usage that would drastically increase the value of the land. To assure herself of the potential value of the land, Bartles orally hires an attorney to investigate the title and records associated with the land in question. Before gaining any information from her attorney, Bartles orally contracts with a builder to construct a huge building on the site. Because of the size of the project, a completion time is difficult to predict. Bartles now discovers that the land is indeed useless, a fact that she obtains through information from her attorney. Bartles now refuses to honor her contracts with Hermes, her attorney, and the builder. Must Bartles honor her contractual agreements?

(Essay)
4.7/5
(34)

A writing required by the statute of frauds may be in any form.

(True/False)
4.9/5
(33)

A signed letter from an employer setting forth details of an oral contract of employment satisfies the statute of frauds.

(True/False)
4.8/5
(38)

Under the majority view, a contract that does not satisfy the statute of frauds is voidable.

(True/False)
4.9/5
(30)

An oral contract to sell a house is binding if:

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(32)

The Uniform Commercial Code contains a statute of frauds rule relating to sales of personal property, specifically:

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(35)

A person who is prevented from enforcing a contract because of the statute of frauds also is prevented from recovering the value of services, property, or money furnished the other party to the oral contract.

(True/False)
4.9/5
(32)

Parol evidence may be admitted to show that a provision was omitted as the result of:

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(33)

An oral contract can be enforced when it relates to:

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(40)

A writing that satisfies the requirement of a writing under the statute of frauds could be evidenced by:

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(41)

An oral agreement to supply a line of credit for two (2) years cannot be enforced because of the statute of frauds.

(True/False)
5.0/5
(38)

The parol evidence rule prohibits only the use of oral testimony that alters an apparently complete written contract.

(True/False)
4.9/5
(30)

If a contract is unclear, it will be interpreted against the party who drafted it.

(True/False)
4.8/5
(36)

Franklin, a hobby-shop supplier, and Gordon, a hobby-shop owner, entered into a contract that provided that Franklin would sell Gordon fifty World War II battleship models at Franklin's cost of $2.95 each, plus a reasonable profit. Gordon brought suit to enforce the contract against Franklin, who refused to deliver the models. Franklin claimed that there was no contract because of indefiniteness. Is Franklin correct?

(Essay)
4.7/5
(34)

If words and numbers contradict each other in a contract, the rule of construction favors the words.

(True/False)
4.9/5
(38)

A contract for the sale of goods with a price of $500 or more requires written proof to be enforceable.

(True/False)
4.9/5
(45)

Parol evidence generally is admissible to explain:

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(39)

The statute of frauds applies to promises to answer for another party's debt, but does not apply to a promise to answer for another party's default.

(True/False)
4.8/5
(37)

A contract is interpreted to give effect to:

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(41)
Showing 21 - 40 of 59
close modal

Filters

  • Essay(0)
  • Multiple Choice(0)
  • Short Answer(0)
  • True False(0)
  • Matching(0)