Exam 2: Foundations of Modern Trade Theory: Comparative Advantage
Exam 1: The International Economy and Globalization71 Questions
Exam 2: Foundations of Modern Trade Theory: Comparative Advantage215 Questions
Exam 3: Sources of Comparative Advantage143 Questions
Exam 4: Tariffs162 Questions
Exam 5: Nontariff Trade Barriers164 Questions
Exam 6: Trade Regulations and Industrial Policies187 Questions
Exam 7: Trade Policies for the Developing Nations305 Questions
Exam 8: Regional Trading Arrangements164 Questions
Exam 9: International Factor Movements and Multinational Enterprises123 Questions
Exam 10: The Balance-of-payments156 Questions
Exam 11: Foreign Exchange206 Questions
Exam 12: Exchange Rate Determination199 Questions
Exam 13: Mechanisms of International Adjustment107 Questions
Exam 14: Exchange Rate Adjustments and the Balance-of-payments122 Questions
Exam 15: Exchange Rate Systems and Currency Crises168 Questions
Exam 16: Macroeconomic Policy in an Open-economy72 Questions
Exam 17: International Banking: Reserves, Debt, and Risk96 Questions
Select questions type
Assume 1990 to be the base year.If by the end of 2004 a country's export price index rose from 100 to 130 while its import price index rose from 100 to 115,its terms of trade would equal 113.
(True/False)
4.8/5
(41)
If the international terms of trade settle at a level that is between each country's opportunity cost:
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(38)
A term-of-trade index that equals 90 indicates that compared to the base year:
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(38)
Is it possible for comparative advantage to change,thus changing the direction of trade?
(Essay)
4.7/5
(38)
Table 2.2.Output possibilities for South Korea and Japan
-Referring to Table 2.2,the opportunity cost of one VCR in Japan is:

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(46)
If Japan and France have identical production possibilities curves and identical community indifference curves:
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(37)
Given free trade,small nations tend to benefit the most from trade since they:
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(39)
Under free trade,Canada would not enjoy any gains from trade with Sweden if Canada:
(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(42)
The mercantilists maintained that a free-trade policy best enhances a nation's welfare.
(True/False)
4.9/5
(32)
Compared to Ricardian trade theory,modern trade theory provides a more general view of comparative advantage since it is based on all factors of production rather than just labor.
(True/False)
4.9/5
(45)
Complete specialization usually occurs under the assumption of increasing opportunity costs.
(True/False)
4.9/5
(44)
If Canada experiences increasing opportunity costs,its supply schedule of steel will be:
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(40)
Assume that the United States and Canada engage in trade.If the international terms of trade coincides with the U.S.cost ratio,the United States realizes all of the gains from trade with Canada.
(True/False)
4.8/5
(39)
Assume that the United States is more efficient than the United Kingdom in the production of all goods.Mutually beneficial trade is possible according to the principle of absolute advantage,but is impossible according to the principle of comparative advantage.
(True/False)
4.8/5
(38)
Advocates of outsourcing by American firms maintain that its advantages consist of
(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(36)
The principle of comparative advantage contends that a nation should specialize in and export the good in which its absolute advantage is smallest or its absolute disadvantage is greatest.
(True/False)
4.8/5
(38)
Adam Smith contended that gold,silver,and other precious metals constituted the wealth of a nation.
(True/False)
4.9/5
(34)
The basis for trade is explained by the principle of absolute advantage according to David Ricardo and the principle of comparative advantage according to Adam Smith.
(True/False)
4.9/5
(37)
Showing 101 - 120 of 215
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)