Exam 1: Overview of Tort Law
Exam 1: Overview of Tort Law27 Questions
Exam 2: Overview of a Tort Case45 Questions
Exam 3: Intentional Torts65 Questions
Exam 4: Negligence: Duty43 Questions
Exam 5: Negligence: Breach of Duty28 Questions
Exam 6: Negligence: Causation40 Questions
Exam 7: Negligence: Damages64 Questions
Exam 8: Negligence: Defenses72 Questions
Exam 9: Malpractice28 Questions
Exam 10: Misrepresentation, Nuisance, and Other Torts76 Questions
Exam 11: Strict Liability26 Questions
Exam 12: Product Liability79 Questions
Exam 13: Defamation and Related Torts67 Questions
Exam 14: Vicarious Liability43 Questions
Exam 15: Joint Liability39 Questions
Exam 16: Tort Reform72 Questions
Exam 17: Automobile Insurance61 Questions
Exam 18: Bad Faith38 Questions
Exam 19: Workers Compensation53 Questions
Select questions type
When is reasonableness of conduct not relevant in a tort case?
(Short Answer)
4.8/5
(35)
We have come full circle in tort law in the sense that we began with the cause of action of , which required no fault, and in modern times we have the cause of action of , which also requires no showing of fault.
(Short Answer)
4.8/5
(39)
Without question, those who create risks should bear the burden of injuries they create rather than those who fall prey to such injury.
(True/False)
4.8/5
(29)
Most states have retained trespass on the case as a cause of action today.
(True/False)
4.8/5
(34)
A tort must be proved by a preponderance of evidence while a crime must be proved _.
(Short Answer)
4.8/5
(40)
"Slippery slope" arguments reflect administrative concerns of courts.
(True/False)
4.9/5
(40)
Showing 21 - 27 of 27
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)