Exam 3: Evaluation and Crime Prevention
Exam 1: Crime and the Fear of Crime21 Questions
Exam 2: Crime Prevention22 Questions
Exam 3: Evaluation and Crime Prevention22 Questions
Exam 4: The Physical Environment and Crime Prevention25 Questions
Exam 5: Neighborhood Crime Prevention23 Questions
Exam 6: The Mass Media and Crime Prevention24 Questions
Exam 7: Developmental Crime Prevention18 Questions
Exam 8: General Deterrence19 Questions
Exam 9: Prediction for Secondary Prevention17 Questions
Exam 10: Situational Crime Prevention16 Questions
Exam 11: Displacement and Diffusion17 Questions
Exam 12: Partnerships for Crime Prevention21 Questions
Exam 13: Substance Use, Crime, and Crime Prevention19 Questions
Exam 14: The School and Crime Prevention21 Questions
Exam 15: Specific Deterrence and Incapacitation18 Questions
Exam 16: Rehabilitation18 Questions
Select questions type
According to the text, the ideal follow-up time for evaluation is six months.
Free
(True/False)
4.8/5
(37)
Correct Answer:
False
The fact that neighborhoods or other geographic areas are often targeted in prevention raises all but which of the following problems?
Free
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(28)
Correct Answer:
E
Which of the following is NOT a threat to external validity listed by Tilley?
Free
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(40)
Correct Answer:
C
Impact evaluations consider the implementation of a program or initiative and involve determining the procedures used to implement a specific program.
(True/False)
4.8/5
(37)
The issue of generalizability involves what are called threats to internal validity.
(True/False)
4.8/5
(35)
Investigating the impact of a prevention technique or intervention on the level of subsequent crime, fear, or other intended outcome is referred to as:
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(31)
Ekblom and Pease argue that the goals of evaluation include all but which of the following?
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(25)
The underlying problem for external validity is that, too often, experimental designs fail to consider the __________.
(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(32)
The taking of measurements in a study that cause change to occur in place of or beyond the impact of the stimulus refers to the problem of:
(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(34)
Process evaluations offer a detailed descriptive account of the program and its implementation.
(True/False)
4.8/5
(26)
Threats to internal validity are factors that could cause the results other than the measures that were implemented.
(True/False)
4.8/5
(30)
Intensity of intervention in relation to target people, places, or crime problems varies from site to site, and the level refers to the external validity problem of intervenor attributes.
(True/False)
4.7/5
(37)
Self-report data is a response to evaluations of crime prevention programs on neighborhoods or other small geographic areas that do not coincide with specific police reporting areas.
(True/False)
4.9/5
(29)
Cost-benefit analysis is a form of process evaluation that requires that an impact evaluation be completed at the same time.
(True/False)
4.8/5
(27)
Something that takes place independent of the experiment and causes the change to take place refers to:
(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(39)
In realistic evaluation, rather than relying exclusively on experimental approaches, evaluation needs to observe the phenomenon in its entirety.
(True/False)
4.8/5
(34)
The fact that crime prevention initiatives rarely rely on a single intervention or approach is an advantage in conducting evaluations.
(True/False)
4.8/5
(41)
The negative findings in an evaluation may be the result of all but which of the following?
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(43)
Which of the following is NOT a reason for an atheoretical evaluation?
(Multiple Choice)
5.0/5
(36)
Showing 1 - 20 of 22
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)