Exam 8: Building Motivation, Formulating Plans, and Evaluating Change
According to Murphy and Dillon, a common element in evaluation is:
A
Discuss three principles of good evaluation.
Three principles of good evaluation include:
1. Validity: This principle refers to the accuracy and truthfulness of the evaluation results. It is important for an evaluation to measure what it is intended to measure. To ensure validity, evaluators must use appropriate methods and tools that align with the goals and objectives of the evaluation.
2. Reliability: Reliability is the consistency and stability of the evaluation results. It is essential for an evaluation to produce consistent results when the same methods are used in similar conditions. To achieve reliability, evaluators must use standardized procedures, ensure data quality, and minimize errors and biases in the evaluation process.
3. Utility: Utility refers to the usefulness and relevance of the evaluation results for decision-making and improvement. A good evaluation should provide actionable insights and recommendations that can inform programmatic and policy decisions. To enhance utility, evaluators should engage stakeholders in the evaluation process, communicate findings effectively, and tailor the evaluation approach to meet the specific needs of the intended users.
By adhering to these principles, evaluators can ensure that their evaluations are credible, informative, and valuable for driving positive change and improvement.
Murphy and Dillon describe a number of methods clinicians can use to help clients resolve their ambivalence about change. Describe three of these techniques.
1. Motivational Interviewing: This technique involves the clinician using open-ended questions, reflective listening, and affirmations to help the client explore their ambivalence about change. By guiding the client to express their own reasons for change, the clinician can help them resolve their ambivalence and increase their motivation for making positive changes.
2. Decisional Balance: This technique involves helping the client weigh the pros and cons of making a change. By exploring the potential benefits and drawbacks of change, the client can gain a clearer understanding of their ambivalence and make a more informed decision about whether to pursue change.
3. Goal Setting: This technique involves collaboratively setting specific, achievable goals with the client. By breaking down the change process into smaller, manageable steps, the client can feel more empowered and motivated to overcome their ambivalence and work towards positive change.
The broad term used to describe practice that is based on the results of empirical scientific research on clinical expertise, interventions, patients' needs, values and preferences is called:
After collaborative assessment and conceptualization, the next step in clinical work is:
List and describe the stages of change proposed by Prochaska and DiClemente.
Motivational Interviewing involves all of the following EXCEPT:
Research that gives us information about a group of individuals in general is called:
Explain what the Stone Center proponents of Relational-Cultural Theory mean when they say "resistance is relational" and not just a force within the client.
In this stage of change, the client establishes goals for change and outlines small-steps:
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)