Exam 17: Privacy on the Job: Information, Monitoring and Investigations
Exam 1: Overview of Employment Law20 Questions
Exam 2: The Employment Relationship20 Questions
Exam 3: Overview of Employment Discrimination20 Questions
Exam 4: Recruitment, Applications, and Interviews20 Questions
Exam 5: Background Checks, References, and Verifying Employment Eligibility20 Questions
Exam 6: Employment Testing20 Questions
Exam 7: Hiring and Promotion Decisions20 Questions
Exam 8: Affirmative Action20 Questions
Exam 9: Harassment20 Questions
Exam 10: Reasonably Accommodating Disability and Religion19 Questions
Exam 11: Work-Life Conflicts and Other Diversity Issues20 Questions
Exam 12: Wages, Hours, and Pay Equity20 Questions
Exam 13: Benefits20 Questions
Exam 14: Unions and Collective Bargaining20 Questions
Exam 15: Occupational Safety and Health20 Questions
Exam 16: Performance Appraisals, Training, and Development20 Questions
Exam 17: Privacy on the Job: Information, Monitoring and Investigations20 Questions
Exam 18: Terminating Individual Employees20 Questions
Exam 19: Downsizing and Post Termination Issues20 Questions
Select questions type
Which of the following torts has as a required element of proof, an intent to harm.
Free
(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(40)
Correct Answer:
D
Your boss has told you that he suspects that his wife (whose desk is next to yours) is cheating on him, and having an affair with another man. Because your desk is next to hers, he has asked you to check her computer for evidence of this when she steps away from her desk, which she frequently must do. In the past, she has asked you to watch for urgent emails from customers and others while she was gone, and to page her, which you have done. So even if she came back unexpectedly and found you at her computer, it would probably not arouse her suspicion. Although you are reluctant to do this, he is your boss, and could make things difficult for you. What should you do?
Free
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(26)
Correct Answer:
B
In Dietz v. Finlay Fine Jewelry , a store clerk who gave an unauthorized discount to a customer was interrogated by security personnel. The court held that:
(Multiple Choice)
5.0/5
(39)
A department store clerk learns that her employer has placed a hidden video camera in the employee changing room. If she sues, the claim would most likely be for:
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(31)
Regarding surveillance and video monitoring of employees, it is correct to say all of the following EXCEPT:
(Multiple Choice)
5.0/5
(26)
Which of the following is an element of an intrusion upon seclusion privacy tort claim?
(Multiple Choice)
5.0/5
(40)
Which of the following torts has as a required element of proof, the matter is not of legitimate concern to the public.
(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(34)
Regarding the monitoring and surveillance of employees, an employer could legally place video cameras in which of the following locations?
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(47)
Which of the following laws mandates that medical information obtained from current employees must be job-related and consistent with business necessity?
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(31)
Amanda is an employee at a high end department store in the HR department and has been in her office all day. After a pair of diamond earrings are found missing from the jewelry department, Mike, the store manager has every employee in the store brought together pursuant to an investigation. Which of the following is true?
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(37)
Under the OSH Act, records of an employee s exposure to toxins must be kept for:
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(40)
In Stengart v Loving Care Agency , the employee used a company laptop to communicate with her lawyer by means of a web-based, password-protected personal email program. She left the firm, returned the laptop, and sued for discrimination. Forensic experts recovered her emails from the laptop for the company, and its attorneys used the emails in discovery, telling no one what they had found. Plaintiff s attorney discovered this, and demanded that these privileged communications be returned, which was refused. The trial court found that Plaintiff had waived her attorney-client privilege. The appellate court reversed, finding that the employer s lawyers were guilty of misconduct. The Supreme court ruled:
(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(36)
Regarding employer searches of employees at the workplace, which of the following is true?
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(40)
Employers may conduct hidden video surveillance of employees:
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(33)
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)