Question 1

In the case Rasul v. Bush (2004), SCOTUS ruled that:

Accepted Answer

A) noncitizen detainees who have been declared enemy combatants and detained in areas controlled by the United States cannot petition for habeas corpus in federal courts. 
B) noncitizen detainees who have been declared enemy combatants and detained in areas controlled by the United States can petition for habeas corpus in federal courts. 
C) noncitizen detainees who have been declared enemy combatants must be tried in federal courts in the United States. 
D) the right to habeas corpus is suspended during war time. 
A) noncitizen detainees who have been declared enemy combatants and detained in areas controlled by the United States cannot petition for habeas corpus in federal courts. 
B) noncitizen detainees who have been declared enemy combatants and detained in areas controlled by the United States can petition for habeas corpus in federal courts. 
C) noncitizen detainees who have been declared enemy combatants must be tried in federal courts in the United States. 
D) the right to habeas corpus is suspended during war time.

Question 2

Military commissions try military personnel for violating the Uniform Code of Military Justice.

Accepted Answer

A) True 
 B)False

Question 3

Stopping travelers in vehicles at a fixed checkpoint for brief questioning about their citizenship and immigration status:

Accepted Answer

A) violates the Fourth Amendment search and seizure requirements. 
B) is not considered a seizure under the Fourth Amendment. 
C) is considered a seizure under the Fourth Amendment but has been held to be constitutional. 
D) is considered a seizure only if officials detain the travelers for a significant amount of time. 
A) violates the Fourth Amendment search and seizure requirements. 
B) is not considered a seizure under the Fourth Amendment. 
C) is considered a seizure under the Fourth Amendment but has been held to be constitutional. 
D) is considered a seizure only if officials detain the travelers for a significant amount of time.

Question 4

Questioning a person without Mirandizing first does not violate the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination.

Accepted Answer

A) True 
 B)False

Question 5

In Demore v. Kim , SCOTUS ruled that mandatory detention for criminal aliens pending removal proceedings always violates due process.

Accepted Answer

A) True 
 B)False

In the case Rasul v. Bush (2004), SCOTUS ruled that:

Military commissions try military personnel for violating the Uniform Code of Military Justice.

Stopping travelers in vehicles at a fixed checkpoint for brief questioning about their citizenship and immigration status:

Questioning a person without Mirandizing first does not violate the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination.

In Demore v. Kim , SCOTUS ruled that mandatory detention for criminal aliens pending removal proceedings always violates due process.

Criminal Procedure and the Constitution

Searches and Seizures

Stop and Frisk

Seizure of Persons Arrest

Searches for Evidence

Special Needs Searches

Self Incrimination

Identification Procedures

Remedies for Constitutional Violations I the Exclusionary Rule

Constitutional Violations II Other Remedies Against Official Misconduct

Court Proceedings I Before Trial

Court Proceedings II Trial and Conviction

After Conviction Sentencing Appeals and Habeas Corpus

Filters

Exam 15: Criminal Procedure in Times of Crisis

In the case Rasul v. Bush (2004), SCOTUS ruled that:

Military commissions try military personnel for violating the Uniform Code of Military Justice.

Stopping travelers in vehicles at a fixed checkpoint for brief questioning about their citizenship and immigration status:

Questioning a person without Mirandizing first does not violate the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination.

In Demore v. Kim , SCOTUS ruled that mandatory detention for criminal aliens pending removal proceedings always violates due process.

Criminal Procedure and the Constitution

Searches and Seizures

Stop and Frisk

Seizure of Persons Arrest

Searches for Evidence

Special Needs Searches

Self Incrimination

Identification Procedures

Remedies for Constitutional Violations I the Exclusionary Rule

Constitutional Violations II Other Remedies Against Official Misconduct

Court Proceedings I Before Trial

Court Proceedings II Trial and Conviction

After Conviction Sentencing Appeals and Habeas Corpus

Filters