Exam 13: Interrogations, Admissions, and Confessions

arrow
  • Select Tags
search iconSearch Question
flashcardsStudy Flashcards
  • Select Tags

Explain the difference between the right to counsel under the Fifth and Sixth Amendments.What are the distinct limitations placed on obtaining statements from a suspect under each approach.

Free
(Essay)
4.8/5
(37)
Correct Answer:
Answered by Examlex AI Copilot

The right to counsel under the Fifth and Sixth Amendments both provide individuals with the right to have legal representation during criminal proceedings, but they have distinct differences and limitations.

The Fifth Amendment provides the right to counsel during custodial interrogations, also known as the Miranda rights. This means that a suspect must be informed of their right to remain silent and their right to an attorney before being questioned by law enforcement. If a suspect invokes their right to counsel, all questioning must cease until their attorney is present. The limitation here is that the right to counsel only applies to custodial interrogations and does not extend to other stages of the criminal process.

On the other hand, the Sixth Amendment provides the right to counsel at all critical stages of a criminal proceeding, including arraignment, trial, and appeal. This means that a defendant has the right to have an attorney present at every stage of the legal process, not just during police interrogations. The limitation here is that the right to counsel under the Sixth Amendment only applies once formal criminal charges have been filed, and it does not extend to pre-arrest or pre-charging stages.

In terms of obtaining statements from a suspect, the distinct limitations placed on each approach are as follows:

Under the Fifth Amendment, if a suspect invokes their right to counsel during a custodial interrogation, law enforcement is prohibited from questioning them further until their attorney is present. Any statements obtained in violation of this right may be deemed inadmissible in court.

Under the Sixth Amendment, once a suspect has been formally charged and has legal representation, all questioning must be conducted in the presence of their attorney. Any attempts to obtain statements from the suspect without their attorney present may also result in the statements being deemed inadmissible in court.

In summary, the Fifth Amendment provides the right to counsel during custodial interrogations, with limitations on questioning without an attorney present, while the Sixth Amendment provides the right to counsel at all critical stages of a criminal proceeding, with limitations on questioning without the presence of an attorney after formal charges have been filed.

When governmental coercion is at issue,most courts examine the voluntariness of a Miranda waiver by inquiring about:

Free
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(30)
Correct Answer:
Verified

A

Failure to comply with Miranda requirements

Free
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(36)
Correct Answer:
Verified

D

The voluntary and intentional relinquishment or abandonment of a known right or privilege is known as a(n)_______________.

(Short Answer)
4.8/5
(37)

Suspects who are interrogated without being Mirandized first:

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(40)

What conditions must be present to trigger Miranda warnings?

(Multiple Choice)
5.0/5
(35)

Both confessions and admissions are incriminating statements.

(True/False)
4.8/5
(25)

A suspect states,"I was in the car,but I didn't know it was stolen." This is

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(38)

Explain the "focus of investigation test" of Escobedo v.Illinois,1964,that preceded the Miranda decision.

(Essay)
5.0/5
(31)

Which of the following factors is relevant in deciding whether the defendant's confession was voluntary?

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(29)

?Which of the following statements is true?

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(35)

The police must observe the requirements imposed by the Miranda rule only when

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(46)

Which of the following tactics,if used by police,would probably not render a confession involuntary by the courts?

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(41)

Miranda warnings are required to be given anytime a person is in custody.

(True/False)
4.8/5
(20)

The ____________is a(n)exception to Miranda's usual warning requirements,where the need for answers to questions in situations posing a threat to society outweighs the need to protect the Fifth Amendment's privilege against self-incrimination.

(Short Answer)
4.8/5
(34)

A confession produced by police threatening violence but not touching the suspect is nevertheless a violation of due process.

(True/False)
4.8/5
(40)

What kind of test is used to determine if a person is in custody?

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(36)

Police detectives begin to interrogate a criminal suspect without having read the Miranda warnings.During this initial questioning,the suspect makes an incriminating statement.The detectives,after hearing the incriminating statement,make the suspect aware of his Miranda rights.Questioning continues and the suspect repeats the incriminating information.

(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(37)

A suspect has been formally charged with a crime (either through prosecutor information or grand jury indictment).The suspect has been assigned defense counsel.While in police custody,the suspect contacts police detectives requesting a meeting to discuss the charges and evidence.The police:

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(22)

________________ occurs when state officials create "a situation likely to induce ...incriminating statements without the assistance of counsel ...."

(Short Answer)
4.7/5
(31)
Showing 1 - 20 of 60
close modal

Filters

  • Essay(0)
  • Multiple Choice(0)
  • Short Answer(0)
  • True False(0)
  • Matching(0)