Exam 41: Employment Law
a. Discuss the rights of an injured employee against her employer under common law.
b. How have workers' compensation acts changed this? Explain your answer.
a. Common law provides that an injured employee can sue her employer for injuries that occurred on the job. Common law defenses included conributory negligence, voluntary assumption of risk, and the fellow servant rule.
b. Under workers' compensation acts, employees are automatically compensated for injuries they sustain within the scope of employment regardless of who was at fault in causing the injury. In return for the coverage provided by the mandatory insurance against such injuries that employers must carry on employees, the employee's right to sue was taken away. The only issues now litigated under workers' compensation acts are whether the injury occurred during the scope of employment and the seriousness of the injury. The issue of employer or employee negligence is not considered. The basis of recovery is strict liability, and common law defenses are not available.
A union is engaged in a labor dispute with Hawkins, Inc. To force Hawkins into resolving the dispute in the union's favor, the union organizes a strike against Boxwell Co., with which the union has no dispute. The union agrees to stop the strike if Boxwell agrees to stop doing business with Hawkins. The strike against Boxwell is a prohibited unfair labor practice under the LMRA.
True
Privacy protection for employees includes a federal statute prohibiting private employers from requiring employees or prospective employees to undergo a lie detector test.
True
A union shop contract requires the employer to hire only union members.
Once a plaintiff has established a prima facie case of discrimination on a disparate treatment theory, and the defendant has articulated a legitimate and non-discriminatory reason for the discrimination, a plaintiff may still win.
The Norris-La Guardia Act gave federal courts the power to issue injunctions in nonviolent labor disputes.
The purpose of the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs is to require affirmative steps to provide opportunities for handicapped people in federal programs.
Claims of unequal pay for jobs of comparable worth may be brought under:
The Supreme Court has recently held that the Constitution prevents all employers from subjecting employees to drug testing without first obtaining a search warrant.
Under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), which of these defenses are available?
a. What is the difference between equal pay for equal work and equal pay for comparable worth?
b. How is it possible to establish a claim for equal pay for comparable worth if the jobs are different jobs?
c. Is equal pay for comparable worth covered by the federal employment discrimination laws? Explain.
IBN has two manufacturing facilities, one in New York and one in Oklahoma. Marjorie has worked in the Oklahoma plant for 15 years assembling resistors. Her sister, Ellen, has worked at the same plant for 15 years also. Their brother, Hank, has worked there for 10 years in the same job as his sisters. Ellen transfers to the New York facility. Their salaries are now as follows: Marjorie-$12 per hour; Ellen-$19.50 per hour; Hank-$14 per hour. Is there a violation of the Equal Pay Act?
Garaty, Inc. is currently engaged in negotiations with one of its major unions. The company is covered by the NLRA. If Garaty issues a factually correct statement regarding its financial status along with the opinion of its auditors that meeting the union demands would require the company to close down, it is likely that Garaty will be in compliance with the act.
In a disparate impact case, the Civil Rights Act of 1991 now provides that if an employer can prove the "business necessity" of a challenged employment practice, the plaintiff cannot win.
A defense available to the employer in an action for workers' compensation is that:
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)