Exam 11: Negligence: Element I: Duty
Exam 1: Introduction to Tort Law and Practice31 Questions
Exam 2: Foreseeability in Tort Law17 Questions
Exam 3: Battery25 Questions
Exam 4: Assault20 Questions
Exam 5: False Imprisonment and False Arrest33 Questions
Exam 6: Misuse of Legal Proceedings24 Questions
Exam 7: Infliction of Emotional Distress21 Questions
Exam 8: Conversion and Trespass to Chattels16 Questions
Exam 9: Strict Liability23 Questions
Exam 10: Negligence: a Summary14 Questions
Exam 11: Negligence: Element I: Duty31 Questions
Exam 12: Negligence: Element II: Breach of Duty79 Questions
Exam 13: Negligence: Element III: Proximate Cause33 Questions
Exam 14: Negligence: Element Iv: Damages43 Questions
Exam 15: Negligence: Defenses29 Questions
Exam 16: Products Liability50 Questions
Exam 17: Survival and Wrongful Death20 Questions
Exam 18: Torts Against and Within the Family27 Questions
Exam 19: Torts Connected With Land47 Questions
Exam 20: Defamation38 Questions
Exam 21: Invasion of Privacy19 Questions
Exam 22: Misrepresentation, Tortious Interference, and Other Torts33 Questions
Exam 23: Additional Tort Defenses50 Questions
Exam 24: Workers Compensation25 Questions
Select questions type
The Andrews test is broader than the Cardozo test.
Free
(True/False)
4.8/5
(33)
Correct Answer:
True
Define duty in the broadest sense.
Free
(Essay)
4.8/5
(25)
Correct Answer:
an obligation or requirement to conform to a standard of conduct prescribed by law
Match the following
Premises:
duty owed to someone in the zone of danger
Responses:
zone of danger
unforeseeable plaintiff
gratuitous
Correct Answer:
Premises:
Responses:
Free
(Matching)
4.9/5
(36)
Correct Answer:
What is the difference between the zone-of-danger test of the majority opinion in Palsgraf and the world-at-large test of the dissenting opinion in Palsgraf ?
(Essay)
4.8/5
(42)
Match the following
Premises:
someone in the zone of danger
Responses:
zone of danger
malfeasance
Andrews
Correct Answer:
Premises:
Responses:
(Matching)
4.8/5
(29)
Match the following
Premises:
failure to act
Responses:
nonfeasance
misfeasance
undertaking
Correct Answer:
Premises:
Responses:
(Matching)
4.8/5
(37)
Match the following
Premises:
dissenting opinion in Palsgraf
Responses:
Andrews
consideration
gratuitous
Correct Answer:
Premises:
Responses:
(Matching)
4.8/5
(34)
Match the following
Premises:
affirmative conduct that is improper or unreasonable
Responses:
Cardozo test
misfeasance
Andrews
Correct Answer:
Premises:
Responses:
(Matching)
4.8/5
(28)
An unforeseeable plaintiff is someone who was not in the zone of danger.
(True/False)
4.7/5
(31)
Match the following
Premises:
wrongful (illegal) actions by a public official
Responses:
Andrews
foreseeable plaintiff
Cardozo test
Correct Answer:
Premises:
Responses:
(Matching)
4.8/5
(25)
The duty of reasonable care requires the defendant to prevent all harm to the plaintiff.
(True/False)
4.8/5
(41)
Match the following
Premises:
doing something
Responses:
Andrews
special relationship
misfeasance
Correct Answer:
Premises:
Responses:
(Matching)
4.8/5
(35)
Rich is a doctor. One day while strolling in the park he sees Adam, a stranger, choking on an apple. Rich does nothing to help Adam. Adam sues Rich for negligently failing to help him.
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(27)
Those who engage in gratuitous undertakings do not have a duty to exercise reasonable care.
(True/False)
4.8/5
(36)
Without a special relationship, the existence of a duty depends on affirmative conduct.
(True/False)
4.9/5
(35)
Since Good Samaritans are not paid for the help they provide, they can never be sued for negligence.
(True/False)
4.8/5
(32)
Match the following
Premises:
needed to impose a duty in the absence of affirmative conduct
Responses:
duty
Cardozo test
misfeasance
Correct Answer:
Premises:
Responses:
(Matching)
4.9/5
(36)
Showing 1 - 20 of 31
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)